User talk:Llez

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Llez!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Archives /Archives/2010 (1) /Archives/2010 (2) /Archives/2011 (1) /Archives/2011 (2) /Archives/2012 (1) /Archives/2012 (2) /Archives/2013 (1) /Archives/2013 (2) /Archives/2014 (1) /Archives/2014 (2) /Archives/2015 (1) /Archives/2015 (2) /Archives/2016 (1) /Archives/2016 (2) /Archives/2017 (1) /Archives/2017 (2) /Archives/2017 (3) /Archives/2018 (1) /Archives/2018 (2) /Archives/2018 (3) /Archives/2019 (1) /Archives/2019 (2) /Archives/2019 (3) /Archives/2019 (4) /Archives/2020 (1) /Archives/2020 (2) /Archives/2020 (3) /Archives/2020 (4) /Archives/2021 (1) /Archives/2021 (2) /Archives/2021 (3) /Archives/2021 (4) /Archives/2022 (1) /Archives/2022 (2) /Archives/2022 (3) /Archives/2022 (4) /Archives/2023 (1) /Archives/2023 (2) /Archives/2023 (3)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turridrupa bijubata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corbicula fluminea (Asian clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used,--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münstertal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münstertal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münstertal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal - Brunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corbicula fluminea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Écomusée d’Alsace 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corbicula fluminea (Asian clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedenkplatte Willibald Strohmeyer 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markuskapelle Kloster St. Trudpert 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münstertal 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münstertal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamelliconcha unicolor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eopleurotoma decussata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, details are missing in the upper part.--Tournasol7 05:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)  Done I uploaded a completely new version --Llez 06:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)  SupportThank you very much. It's much better:) Good quality now.--Tournasol7 09:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamelliconcha unicolor 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum salisburyi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Écomusée d’Alsace 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Écomusée d’Alsace 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westwegportal Dreiländereck Lörrach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamelliconcha unicolor, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamelliconcha unicolor, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Virtual-Pano 07:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ParisTaras 21:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Virtual-Pano 07:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Virtual-Pano 07:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loripes orbiculatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Virtual-Pano 07:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok imo.--ArildV 17:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loripes orbiculatus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Virtual-Pano 12:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grube Teufelsgrund - Münstertal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Virtual-Pano 12:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Contrasimnia xanthochila 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Contrasimnia xanthochila 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good perspective --Plozessor 17:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Trudpert Münstertal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loripes orbiculatus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loripes orbiculatus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple and green CA to be removed --Tagooty 05:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 07:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anodonta anatina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomacea bridgesii (Spike-topped Apple Snail), shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anodonta anatina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudonebularia tabanula, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trigonoceps occipitalis - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atlantilux rubra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anodonta anatina (Duck mussel), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 01:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anodonta anatina (Duck mussel), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Famberhorst 05:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unio pictorum 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atlantilux rubra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 06:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Trigonoceps occipitalis - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trigonoceps occipitalis - Vogelpark Steinen 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 08:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 08:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 08:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unio pictorum 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Unio pictorum ssp. latirostris (Painter's Mussel), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Unio pictorum ssp. latirostris (Painter's Mussel), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Famberhorst 05:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum lenhilli, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualitry --Michielverbeek 05:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chondrina arcadica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 06:46, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. nigrosignata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 04:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. nigrosignata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phragmipedium - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobium farmeri var. aureoflavum - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aechmea fasciata - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aechmea 'Blue Rain' - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum mica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smaug giganteus - Wilhelma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 05:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vipera ammodytes - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 05:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crotaphytus collaris - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merops apiaster - Wilhelma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isteiner Schwellen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The top is a bit unsharp, but IMHO sharp enough for QI. --C messier 19:27, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Münstertal 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münstertal 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bitis gabonica - Wilhelma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodylus porosus - Eye - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polypedates leucomystax - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thorichthys meeki - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 09:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paracanthurus hepatus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. alboradiata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Virtual-Pano (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. alboradiata, Left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alectoris rufa - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great picture. --Plozessor 05:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomacanthus navarchus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gomphosus varius - Wilhelma 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Atlantilux rubra 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atlantilux rubra 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum diutenerum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The dust spots should be removed. --Ermell 06:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 11:48, 28 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donacilla cornea 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. variegata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donacilla cornea var. variegata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Eisenberg castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serratovola rubicunda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Serratovola rubicunda, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capulus ungaricus (Bonnet Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum malleopunctum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serratovola rubicunda 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Serratovola rubicunda, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenneria pustulata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --AFBorchert 06:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrogastra densestriata gredleri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jenneria pustulata (Jenner's Cowry), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hohenfreyberg 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Eisenberg - Bayern 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gafrarium dispar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 07:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Famberhorst 06:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pfronten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 06:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gafrarium dispar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gafrarium dispar, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrogastra densestriata gredleri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Ercé (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochalpbahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lottia subrugosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg cable car 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kässbohrer PistenBully 300 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochalpbahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiracolpus pagoda 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 34.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burg Rötteln - Lörrach 34.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gafrarium dispar, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lottia subrugosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskapelle - Steingaden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskapelle - Steingaden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kässbohrer PistenBully 300 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocallista nimbosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stiracolpus pagoda (Pagoda Turret), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocallista nimbosa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskapelle - Steingaden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskapelle - Steingaden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kässbohrer PistenBully 300 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocallista nimbosa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pfronten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one shows the opposite curvature of the horizon then File:View of Pfronten 02.jpg.  Done New stitch with horizon correction --Llez 18:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 17:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Better. But please check the alignment of the leftmost frames. They seem tilted cw. The horizon and also the hut and the slats on the fence appear this way to me. --Milseburg 09:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Llez 17:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Pfronten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizon looks slightly arched. --Milseburg 16:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Info Since the distance to the horizon is more than 100 km, the curvature of the earth can be seen on the horizon. --Llez 21:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Certainly not. With this curvature the Earth would be very small. --Milseburg 15:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)  Done New stitch with horizon correction --Llez 18:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC) I think, this is ok and QI now. --Milseburg 09:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the Schlossbergalm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view. I would remove the slight rainbow in the tree on the right. --Milseburg 10:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 17:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrocallista nimbosa (Sunray Venus Clam). fossil right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Upper part is out of focus but seems still ok. --Plozessor 06:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lepeta scaldensis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costatophora princeps 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrocallista nimbosa (Sunray Venus Clam). fossil left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcinella cornuta 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lepeta scaldensis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcinella cornuta 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lottia tranquebarica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jenneria pustulata 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jenneria pustulata 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arcinella cornuta (Florida Spiny Jewelbox Clam), left valve, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arcinella cornuta (Florida Spiny Jewelbox Clam), right valve. juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jägerhaus - Hohenschwangau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitonium tenellum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the top of the trees. There are visible CAs. --XRay 08:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 10:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lottia tranquebarica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted CCW. --C messier 07:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamelea gallina 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium tenellum (Small Wentletrap), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's some CA on that bottom gutter. Also it seems to have a blue tint (the shadows are blueish). --Plozessor 06:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This too has a blue tint. --Plozessor 06:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here, slight blue tint on the shadows ... --Plozessor 08:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Done --Llez 09:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 09:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamelea gallina 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are some dust spots in the sky --Imehling 07:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC) There is still another faint one on the left side of the tower top --Imehling 17:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Congratulations, sharp eye! --Llez 09:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Thank you for the compliment. I also have lots of troubles with these pesky dust spots --Imehling 10:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamelea gallina (Chicken Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 07:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamelea gallina (Chicken Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocallista nimbosa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cavolinia tridentata (Three Tooth Cavoline), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesfilz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrocallista nimbosa (Sunray Venus Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thyca crystallina 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macrocallista nimbosa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusually lack of detail. How come? --Ermell 23:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the review. The colour spots are not sharp in the original, thev have blurred outlines (Compare also with the right valve, you judged a day before - no difference). If you have a look on the surface structures (grooves, edges, also the inner side top right), they are sharp. --Llez 06:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the explanation. --Ermell 17:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Small stream - Alpseekessel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Alpenrose - Hohenschwangau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epitonium angulatum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macrocallista nimbosa (Sunray Venus Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia decussata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thyca crystallina, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia decussata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 06:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epitonium angulatum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia decussata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau Castle 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia decussata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 06:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vexillum micra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Neuschwanstein Castle 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neuschwanstein Castle 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee - Pindarplatz - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirapecten mirificus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum micra, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirapecten mirificus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum castum, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten mirificus (Miraculous Scallop), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten mirificus (Miraculous Scallop), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branderschrofen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoher Straußberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branderschrofen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tegelberg - Zugspitze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Tegelberg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara antiquata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum unifasciale, shell, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pseudonebularia lienardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carlina acaulis - Tegelberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branderschrofen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraglider - Tegelberg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara antiquata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wieskirche 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wieskirche 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Kaskade - Musikpavillon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Kaskade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Neptunbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Amor mit Delfinen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Famabrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Gartenvase 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Gartenvase 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This looks slightly rotated clockwise. --Plozessor 06:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 07:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neocancilla kayae, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 14:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof - Gärtnerhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Amor 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tegelbergbahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The sky is a bit weird, but QI for me. --C messier 21:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vexillum stercopunctis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Hundinghütte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia barbata var. elongata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Ehemalige Bauhütte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Einsiedelei des Gurnemanz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Einsiedelei des Gurnemanz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia barbata var. elongata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 17:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia barbata var. elongata (European Bearded Ark), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Ostparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The top part is a bit noisy. --Plozessor 06:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 09:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Maurischer Kiosk 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Wasserparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris obovata 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

--QICbot (talk) 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia barbata var. elongata (European Bearded Ark), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pusia zebrina, shell, spotted form.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosspark Linderhof - Terrassengärten - Wasserparterre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please have a look to the castle. It looks like tilted CW. --XRay 16:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 17:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lirophora paphia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)