User talk:Florian Fuchs

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DI Florian Fuchs!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Lenkererhebung1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Lenkererhebung1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

DI Florian Fuchs (talk) 04:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Lenkererhebung1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Lenkererhebung1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

212.152.179.14 04:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Kategorie

...heitßt auf englisch Category, daher ist das auch des Namensraums Name hier ;) Grüße, abf /talk to me/ 14:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token ceb1c022cd458715c0d60cd62a5cc73f

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Garmin-Oregon 400t-EGNOS.jpg

File:Garmin-Oregon 400t-EGNOS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ALE! ¿…? 12:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Martin Rummel.jpg

Hello!

Could you tell me please, what the problem is regaring my OTRS request for File:Martin Rummel.jpg? The template say my mail was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file.

Thank you!

--DI Florian Fuchs (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please see the email, that was sent to you today at 10:58 UTC; this explains (at the bottom) the steps that you need to take to confirm permission. Stifle (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Florian Fuchs, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicher Kölnbrein mit Ankogel im Hintergrund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition and lighting, poor definition but QI IMO --Moroder 20:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehrgang auf Festung Hohensalzburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sender Gaisberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ericsson T10s.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burghof auf Festung Hohensalzburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gaisberg Transmitter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support No objections.--Jetstreamer (talk) 10:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garmin III Plus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mattbuck 15:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Kinney mit Mount Whitehorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbert Lake beim Icefields Parkway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterfowl Lakes beim Icefields Parkway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Agnes im Banff National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 04:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kinney Lake.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bow in Calgary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boom Lake im Banff National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Iifar 12:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lake Kinney mit Mount Whitehorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Kinney mit Mount Whitehorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Agnes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--JLPC (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:24, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johnston Canyon-Lower Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The time of exposure is too long IMO, but it is a matter of taste. Any other opinion ?--Jebulon 15:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC) The technique has been properly done, QI. --Kadellar 19:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lake Agnes im Banff National Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Agnes im Banff National Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Europa-Venedig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 16:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyramid Mountain and Lake at dawn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 05:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Hohensalzburg bei Dämmerung-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festung Hohensalzburg bei Dämmerung-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great view! --Poco a poco 17:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plain of the Six Glaciers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 09:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Icefields_Parkway_near_Columbia_Icefield.jpg

… macht sich gut als Desktop-Hintergrund :-) --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke, so war es auch gedacht :) --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icefields Parkway near Columbia Icefield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bow Lake beim Icefields Parkway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI (at least). - A.Savin 11:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bow Lake beim Icefields Parkway.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bow Lake beim Icefields Parkway.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crowfoot Glacier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crowfoot Mountain and Glacier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südwestende des Lake Louise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mautner Markhof Fabrik in Klagenfurt-004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. Cheminey tilted.--Grondin 19:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Uploaded a new version --Florian Fuchs 04:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC) It rests the distorted perspective (see note)--Grondin 09:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC) Uploaded a new version --Florian Fuchs 05:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Good quality. --Grondin 10:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mautner Markhof Fabrik in Klagenfurt-005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilt corrected --Florian Fuchs 16:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar awarded

		Congratulations on your 1000th edit
		On behalf of your fellow editors, I want to personally thank you for everything you do to make Wikimedia Commons a better place. Senator2029 14:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smoo Cave-Second Chamber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming. --Florstein 15:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Smoo Cave-Second Chamber.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smoo Cave-Second Chamber.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Florian Fuchs, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 17:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Varrich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Haneburger 08:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glasgow Science Centre exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be useful to add "exterior" in scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• Done. Although there is not a single picture of the interior in the category. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
• Be optimistic, there will be. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glasgow Science Centre and Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tràigh Allt Chàilgeag facing northeast, Highland, Scotland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Interview for Wikimedia Blog

Hi Florian,

My name is Michael Guss and I'm a communications volunteer with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Wikimedia blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on Wikimedia Commons. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/ Given that one of your photos,Smoo Cave-Second Chamber, is scheduled for 17 July 2013, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by email to discuss your photography and your POTD. Please let me know if you would be interested! You can email me at mgusswikimedia.org or respond on my talk page.

Thanks,

MGuss (WMF) (talk) 18:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tràigh Allt Chàilgeagg, Highland, Scotland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please look at my question in the picture. --Dirtsc 17:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC) * Thanks for pointing that out. I fixed the problem. --Florian Fuchs 10:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC) One more thing then: Did you enhance the colors? It seems a little bit too saturated for Scotland. --Dirtsc 14:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC) I reduced the saturation a bit. The rest comes from the polfilter. Actually, the scene looks like it was taken in the Caribbean. However, the weather was exactly like that on this day. --Florian Fuchs 16:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks that you compared it to the Caribbean. I would not have been so harsh. ;-) --Dirtsc 05:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creag na Ceapaich, Highland, Scotland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Culloden Battlefield- Leanach Cottage in Culloden Moor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

VIS promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Smoo Cave.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Smoo Cave.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Das eine Bild war gestern auf der Titelseite (gratuliere) und deshalb gesperrt. Das ist jetzt vorbei. User:KrinkleBot führt aber dieselbe Sperre auf dem Umweg über China nochmal ein und hebt sie nicht so schnell wieder auf. Bitte das Abzeichen selber nachtragen, wenn es wieder geht… --Ikar.us (talk) 00:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Ikar.us (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großglockner vom Parkplatz des Lucknerhauses fotografiert-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Cimaross auf den Großglockner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 08:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neat Hausnotruf NEO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunstall Lifeline VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorola CM360 Radio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorola MDRMN5029A Keypad Microphone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:33, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MDRMN5029A Keypad Microphone with highlighted keys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braun Series 7 799c-7 electric shaver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments We don't know what will be the usage of this material in the future. It could end up prited out in a truck trailer e.g. please, always try to upload the highest resolution posible, that's what most people here do, QI btw --Poco a poco 01:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy S4 mini Frontside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What about the copyright on the image displayed on the screen? --A.Savin 13:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC) That's easy. I have the copyright as you can see here: File:Lake Moraine-Banff National Park.jpg.--Florian Fuchs 06:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)  Support OK. --A.Savin 10:10, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunstall Installers Keypad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tunstall Piperfon Connect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stage of Teatro La Fenice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Excelsior (Lido di Venezia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach Cabins in front of Hotel Excelsior (Lido di Venezia)-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 09:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Moraine-Banff National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 06:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RealTek RTL2838 DVB-T USB Stick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ogden Point Breakwater in Victoria at dawn-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ogden Point Breakwater in Victoria at dawn-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Falls near Whistler, British Columbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like that the water is not frozen. Good quality. --Steindy 11:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsonite Pro-DLX 4 Rolling Tote 16.4 Inch Black.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good. There is just one cutout error at the tyre. --Cccefalon 18:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC) Corrected the error. Done--Florian Fuchs 04:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Well done! --Cccefalon 07:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica in Harbour of Kiel (Ostseekai).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-lift on deck 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-Salone Around the Clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 05:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-Discoteca Fever-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. These ones look like professional interior shots. --Xicotencatl 05:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-Discoteca Fever-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa-Pacifica-Teatro Stardust2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-Sala da ballo Wien Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 06:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica-Biblioteca Imagine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 06:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa Pacifica in Geiranger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ich fand die dunklere Version wesentlich besser. Die vorgestellte Fassung ist so blass, dass kaum Konturen erkennbar sind. -- Spurzem 22:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Reverted to the previous version with a new crop. --Florian Fuchs 04:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC) Very good -- Spurzem 12:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellesylt-Picknick Area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit hazy but good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 12:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulafjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bose QuietComfort 25 Acoustic Noise Cancelling Headphones with Carry Case.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Panorama Wörthersee Ost

War Samstag mit dem Schraubendampfer Thalia (1909) am Wörthersee und schreib gerade in de:Wörthersee.

Dein Panorama des halben Sees aus 2011 ist genial: Dank Nachmittagssonne ist die Klagenfurter Bucht rechts im Auflicht 7 km entfernt gut zu sehen, der Schatten des gut zu erkennenden "Schwammerls" (so hab ich es um 1970 als 14-Jähriger in der Gegend gehört) des ehemaligen Pyramidenkogelturms ist schön freigestellt. Und dann gibt es diesen Retroreflex des Sonnenlichts – ich glaub von den kugeligen Chloroblasten in den Nadeln/Blättern herrührend – an den Waldbäumen, sichtbar als heller Schimmer um den Turmschatten.

Der Panoramawinkel reicht von NNW bis OOSO. Der Schatten fluchtet etwas rechts des Buckels des Südufers bei Maiernigg (1 km westlich der Seeausmündung), daraus schätze ich die Richtung des Schattens mit 5° nördlicher als Ost ab. Das Aufnahmedatum 3. September liegt immerhin noch 18 Tage vor der Tag- und Nachtgleiche (TNG), zu der die Sonne exakt im Westen untergeht.

Zur TNG würde 5° südlicher als West unter der Annahme von 45° (real 46°...) Nord Position auf der Erde zugleich 5° über Horizontal und damit * √2/2 = 7° Bahnwinkel über Sonnenuntergang bedeuten. (7°/360°)*24 h = 0,4666 h = 28 Minuten vor Sonnenuntergang um 18 Uhr also 17h32 Aufnahmezeitpunkt bedeuten.

18 Tage ist 20 % des 90-Tage Abstands zur Sommersonnenwende. 20 % * pi/2 (Aufsteilung des Sinus beim Nulldurchgang) = 31 % der Effekte der Sommer-Sonnenbahn haben wir schon.

Genauer:

Laut de: Jahreszeiten lag der Herbstpunkt am 23. September 2011, 11:05 MESZ.

Sein Abstand zum Aufnahmezeitpunkt (geschätzt) 3. September 17:05 Uhr MESZ ist dann 19,75 d.

19,75 d / 91,75 d (Vierteljahr) = 0,2164

> * pi/2 = 0,340 (= 34 % Sommereffekt auf die scheinbare Sonnenbahn)

> * Erdneigung (de:Ekliptik) 23,4° = 7,95°

Richtung West gesehen steht die Sonne um 18h (Sonnenzeit) nicht am Horizont und West, sondern 7,95° weiter "(ca. 45°) rechts oben"

West überstreicht sie daher 7,95 Bahngrade früher und steht dabei √2 * 7,95° = 11,25° über dem Horizont

Im Bild ist die Sonne 5° vor West, also * √2 = 7,07 Bahngrade früher.

7,95° + 7,07° = 15,02°

> * 24 h / 360° = 1,0013 h = 1h00,8

Aufnahmezeitpunkt rekonstruiere ich damit mit 18:00 - 1h01 = 16:59 MEZ = 17:59 MESZ

Fehlerquellen:

Geo-Ort von neuem Turm in google maps genommen, der alte stand vielleicht etwas woanders. Annahme +/- 50 m / 5 km = 0,01 Bogenmass = 0,56 ° ... = +/- 2,24 min

Geo Ort Aufnahme 46,6° gegenüber Vereinfachung 45° = 3,56 % Winkelabweichung. Die Sonnenbahn ist also etwas steiler vom Untergangsort im Westen aufragend.

Der Sonnenstand "5° südlicher als West" wirkt sich dann um 3,56 % * (gut) √2 = (gut) 5,03 % stärker auf die Sonnenbahnstelle aus. Aus 7,07° von vorhin werden +5,10 % = 7,43°.

Die Sommer-Abweichung von 7,95° wirkt nur linear um (gut) 3,56 % vergrössert auf den Bahnwinkel. Aus 7,95° werden +3,60 % = 8,24°.

Bahn-Winkelsumme = 7,43° + 8,24° = 15,67° = 1,0447 h = 1h03

Aufnahmezeitpunkt für 46,6° N genauer rekonstruiert: 18:00 - 1h03 = 16:57 MEZ = 17:57 MESZ

Tatsächlich stehen wir dort auf 14°(08') Ost. Die Sonne kommt hier erst 1° NACH dem MEZ-Meridian 15° Ost vorbei. * 24h / 360° ... also + 4 min = 18:01 MESZ.

+/- 2,24 min Fehler für Ortsdifferenz Turm alt vs. Turm neu

1° Visierfehler Schatten am Bild mal (gut) √2 = 1,5° Bahn = +/- 6 min

1° Verzerrung google maps ...................detto.................. = +/- 6 min

zwischengespeichert

--Helium4 (talk) 11:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

mir etwa 1 km weit weg zu liegen, abgeschätzt als 1/2 der Entfernung zur Reifnitzer Bucht (ganz rechts im Bild)

Danke! Ich freue mich, dass Dir das Bild gut gefällt. Allerdings bin ich mir sehr sicher, dass die Uhrzeit in den EXIF Daten sehr genau ist, da sie auch mit der vom GPS gemessenen Zeit übereinstimmt. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thuraya satellite phones, Thuraya XT-PRO DUAL.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Image is useful and used, but can the scope be narrowed? Possibly with the model number? That would make this best in scope and remove all issues. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
•  CommentSure, I just added it.--Florian Fuchs (talk) 04:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swissphone RES.Q Hybrid with GSM and GPS module.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Inmarsat IsatPhone Pro SIM card.jpg

File:Inmarsat IsatPhone Pro SIM card.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 18:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DJI Mini 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left foot looks cropped of, not sure --Poco a poco 12:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC) It is not cropped. I just checked the original picture.--Florian Fuchs 13:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC) I just uploaded a new picture with the same motive. Maybe, the new perspective works better. --Florian Fuchs 16:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)  Support This one looks better, thanks --Poco a poco 11:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)