Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common Jezebel Delias eucharis by kadavoor 2.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Common Jezebel Delias eucharis by kadavoor 2.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 10:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Delias eucharis
  •  Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Oppose compression artifacts attributable to the camera --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Oppose -- A marvelous butterfly but a terrible image quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment -- could you explain a bit more?
    • Sure. As Carschten already mentioned the problem are the compression artifacts. Not only in the background, where they appear like small geometric figures "invented" by the compression algorithm but also in the subject, where they affect the detail and sharpness. Always choose the maximum possible resolution and image quality, especially when using compact cameras with small sensors. Please take a look at the present featured pictures of insect (and butterflies) in our galleries to have a idea of what kind of quality is required. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]