Commons:Candidatas a imaxes destacadas

Candidatas a imaxes destacadas noutras linguas:

Shortcut: COM:FPC Estas son as imaxes candidatas para convérterse en imaxes destacadas. Por favor teña en conta que isto non é o mesmo que ser a imaxe do día.

Para consultar o arquivo de propostas vexa: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log

Hai unha lista das imaxes destacadas organizada por data.

Véxase tamén: quality image candidates e Photography critiques

Procedemento formal[edit]

Proposta[edit]

Se vostede cre que está en presenza dunha imaxe destacada ou creou unha imaxe que cumpre os requisitos para considerarse valiosa, que ademais dispón dunha descrición e licenza apropiada, copie o nome da imaxe na caixa do formulario (incluído o prefixo Image:), a continuación do texto que contén a caixa:

Deseguido, debe incluír de xeito manual un enlace á paxina que creou na cima da lista de propostas.

Votación[edit]

Pode usar os seguintes modelos para expresar o seu apoio:

{{Support}} ( Support) / {{Concordo}} ( Agree)

ou estoutros para expresar oposición:

{{Oppose}} ( Oppose) / {{Discordo}} ( Oppose),

Tamén pode usar:

{{Neutral}} ( Neutral) / {{Neutro}} ( Neutral)
{{Comment}} ( Comment)
{{Info}} ( Info)

Por favor intente incluír algunhas palabras que xustifiquen porque lle gusta ou disgusta a imaxe, en particular cando o voto sexa contrario. Lembre tamén asinar (~~~~).

Políticas e normas sobre candidatas a imaxes destacadas[edit]

Regras xerais[edit]

After the end of the voting period the result will be determined on day 15 after nomination (shown in the time-table below). So the voting period is two weeks (plus the hours until the end of day 14). Votes added on day 15 or after are not counted.
Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
Nominators can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by simply writing "I withdraw my nomination".
Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a depository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
Pictures can be taken from the list if they have no support (not counting the nominator's) on day number 7 (day of nomination + 7).

Regras para as imaxes candidatas[edit]

A imaxe pode convérterse nunha imaxe destacada se cumpre as seguintes condicións:

Dispor dunha licenza apropiada (por suposto)
Contar como mínimo con 5 votos de apoio
A relación entre apoio/oposición debe ser de 2/1 como mínimo (unha maioría de dous terzos)
Non poden ser imaxes destacadas dúas versiións diferentes da mesma imaxe, só aquela co maior número de votos.

Para as instrucións sobre como proceder coas propostas antigas, vexa Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. These require 2/3 majority (and a minimum of 5 votes) agreeing to delist from featured pictures. If there is not 2/3 agreeing to delist it, it stays as a featured picture. For these, vote {{Keep}} Keep (it deserves to be a featured picture) or {{Delist}} Delist (it doesn't deserve to be a featured picture). Please provide a link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page). Otherwise the same rules as above apply. Please use this link to add a new removal candidate.

Guidelines for nominators[edit]

Below you can find some informal rules picture should match:

Resolution - graphics located on Commons may be used not only for viewing them on a screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices would be used in the future neither, so it is important that pictures being nominated have a resolution as high as possible. A resolution of at least 2 million pixel (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now.
Focus - every important object on the picture should be sharp.
Foreground and background - foreground and background objects may be pretty distracting. You should check if something in front of the subject doesn't hide some important elements and if something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example if the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
General quality - pictures being nominated should have good technical quality.
Value - our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
- almost all sunsets are pretty, and most of such pictures are not different in the essence from others,
- nightshots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
- beautiful does not always mean valuable.

Not every rule has to be matched, e.g. a picture may have a low resolution, because higher resolution photos cannot be taken (subject may be dead), or the event is not going to occur again.

Guidelines for Evaluating Photographs[edit]

There are several criteria for evaluating images.

On the technical side, we have exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Digital cameras (or images) have a narrower latitude than film. Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.

Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The “Rule of Thirds” is a good guideline for composition and is an inheritance from the painting school. The idea is to divide the image with two imaginary horizontal and two vertical lines, thus dividing the image into thirds horizontally and vertically. Centering the subject is almost always considered a negative practice. Subjects of interest are placed in one of the “interest points”, where horizontal and vertical lines intersect (4 interest points are created). Horizons are never places in the middle, for they “cut” the image in half. They are placed either in the upper or lower horizontal line. Main idea here is NOT to center subject.

Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better over the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the “unnatural” nature of the pose would be a good photograph.

Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and viceversa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, etc.

Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.

Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.

Color is important. Over saturated colours are not good.

Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the “feel” to the touch….

Perspective refers to the “angle” accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.

Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.

Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.

Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.

Symbolic meaning or relevance…. Well, this is where opinion wars start…. A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.

Images can be culturally biased by the photograher and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image “speaks” to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, hapiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations….

Above all, Be polite[edit]

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone elses. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember.... all rules can be broken

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

To add your nomination to the list: Open this & add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Featured Picture Candidates[edit]

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:View of Pfronten 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 09:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:023 African pygmy kingfisher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info No FPs of this genus (Ispidina) and of this species (Ispidina picta). Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Olive Groves Fields Spello Umbria Sep23 A7C 07785.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 06:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
Info View of olive groves and fields in the foothills and valleys of Umbria, SE of Spello. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Didn't expect to be taken in by this, but the landscape is very pleasant, and the composition with layering diagonals in the cool light works perfectly. --Cart (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:2023 Grindavik eruption.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 01:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Volcanism
Info created by the Icelandic Meteorological Office- uploaded by WeatherWriter - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not under a free license, and too small by today standards. Yann (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Common kingfisher in Japan, December 2023 - 4915.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 19:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Will support with enthusiasm but I think it is oversaturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Done. --Laitche (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Fantastic capture! Great shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Per Basile. --Ermell (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Exemplary great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info Color adjustment applied. --Laitche (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Graceful Pitta 0A2A8564.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 16:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pittidae_(Pittas)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Another difficult bird. Slightly underexposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Given the settings showing up in exif data (1/10 sec, f/4, 3,200 ISO, 600 mm), this shot might have been difficult to take, in a very dark place, and certainly with a good tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A bit strong vignetting but still very good picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support as per Giles Laurent. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Szénrakodó-esztergom.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 13:02:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Hungary (missing title)
Info created & uploaded by Krischneider Péter - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:White-winged forest sylph (Ceratrichia nothus nothus) underside Nyamebe Bepo.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 21:43:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
Info No FPs of this genus of small skipper butterflies from West Africa. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice light and high level of detail with both antennas in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Male Bush Elephant Crossing Road Kafue Jul23 A7R 05179.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 08:49:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info A young male African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) striding across the forest road in early morning, trunk raised to smell, Kafue National Park, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Elephants are so easy to photograph (and many FPs); the composition needs to be more interesting with the animal being on a road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Per Yann. ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Charles, I miss the extraordinary part of this image (lighting, detail, activity,...). I don't think either that the human-made road helps here. Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I understand that it must be a great experience to see a wild elephant this close, but there is nothing of that little extra in the composition, light or the things that would make this stand out. And the road doesn't help here. --Cart (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Table-banquette by Annie Tribel 1968 - Design Museum Brussels Belgium.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 02:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support A nice photo though clipped whites is a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 05:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Looks timelessly futuristic and could have come from the set design for the Hilton of Space Station 5 in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Great symmetrical capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 03:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Others
Info Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River, in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Fishing activity on the Doce River has been significantly affected after the 2015 environment disaster, when the failure of a dam released 43.7 million cubic metres of mine tailings into the river, causing a toxic mudflow to pollute its waters; the mudflow consequently reached the Atlantic Ocean 17 days later. This image illustrates all the drama that has occurred since then. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support You can say "too minimalist composition" but there's a whole aforementioned dramatic context behind the image. -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment No reason for black and white, imho. --Laitche (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Original version[edit]

Info @Laitche: Right, I just uploaded the original version; let's see what others think about this (P.S.: I still prefer the B&W style, in my opinion). ★ 09:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pristimantis elegans Chingaza.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 11:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Strabomantidae (Frogs)
Info This species is endemic to the Eastern Andes of Colombia and is IUCN red list Vulnerable. It was found by sound triangulation on a rainy afternoon. No FPs of this family of frogs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Focus stacking at this distance is not easy, and here the result is very clean. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Exceptional image of a rare subject. --Tagooty (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment A great, sharp photo of the Pristimantis elegans, certainly not taken under easy conditions. There are some bright dots/traces on dark ground in the right and upper right part of the image. If you like, I can remove them and provide you the edit via transfer link. But if the dots are supposed to be like that, no offense, I just want to help :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

White spots pretty much as RAW, but brightened during stacking, so I've toned them back thanks. Streaks are rain. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Thanks very much for your editing, Charles. But I only meant the small white dots on the dark background on the right and not the reflections on the foliage. I have now annotated it above. I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly and we misunderstood each other as a result. I took the liberty of retouching yesterday's version (revision from 22:13, Dec 18, 2023). Please feel free to use it if you like: Link to download. I apologize for the misunderstanding. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Akelei Blüte geschlossen stacking-20230506-RM-120202.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 15:21:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ranunculaceae
Info Closed columbine flower. Focus stack of 15 images: All by me -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Another beautiful semi-contre-jour take with great technical and compositional quality. Thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very classy. --Cart (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support A bit cramped composition but nice. --Laitche (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Dachstuhl des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02596-HDR RAW-Export.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 18:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info Image depicting a ladder and window as symbol; created in the attic of Hof town hall, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The overexposure was clear in this photo, an attempt was made to reduce it by lowering the lighting until the white was transformed into gray. And no wow for the composition --Wilfredor (talk) 06:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Bright part of the image wasn't handled very well and the processing treatment has left strange artifacts around the window frame. Maybe a blue sky or an interesting cloud would be better than a rainy grey day? Out of interest, what was the symbolism supposed to be here? BigDom (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Perhaps not the best angle for this. When faced with a very bright opening, it's often better to go for the things that the light illuminates and let the bright window be implied. So many cool angles and lines in the scene that could be used for that. Making the light grey doesn't help either. --Cart (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for the critics :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Riomaggiore SE Wide Cinque Terre Italy Sep23 A7C 07305.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 15:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
Info The colourful village of Riomaggiore on a cloudy afternoon. One of the five villages of Cinque Terre, Italy which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 18:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The weather did not help in this photo, it also looks unclear, possibly due to lens distortion or lack of luminosity. Also the composition seems to try to place the sea and the houses, but neither of them seems like a main subject, the houses look cut off and the sea too. The contrast and low exposure make this colorful scene look like a Gothic city. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately I agree with Wilfredo regarding the composition and the fact that the weather was not on your side this time, bad luck. BigDom (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. To me the beauty is the bright colourful buildings despite the overcast sky. --Tagooty (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre, Málaga, España, 2023-05-20, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 08:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain
Info Ceiling of the Oratory of Saint Mary Queen and Mother, Málaga, Spain. The church was constructed in 2008 and is host of the Confraternity of the Sorrows. The paintings in the ceiling, done with acrylic paint, are work of Raúl Berzosa Fernández and were executed in different phases between 2008 and 2014. The 140 square metres (1,500 sq ft) surface is dedicated to the Coronation of the Virgin. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A very impressive, beautiful ceiling fresco, excellently captured; a fine example of comparatively new paintings of this type in a modern church building. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Unusual to see a modern interpretation. The 21st Century people are so well executed. (the photo's OK too!) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Striking image --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The mural on the downside of the floor in the top of the image makes it unique --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 20:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support for the composition and technical quality but clarity needed on the copyright status. {{FoP-Spain}} (which is missing by the way) only mentions outdoor artworks such as those in parks, streets and other thoroughfares. What is the situation for indoor artworks or are these ones known to be freely licensed? BigDom (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template added, thank you. Poco a poco (talk)

Support Modern frescos in this "old" style are an acquired taste. To me they look rather tacky, but it's a happy tacky that lots of devout people evidently like, and this is a really good photo of a great example of it. --Cart (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Infinity mirror, hand-washing sink and wardrobes in the spa of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 22:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nicely done. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question How did you not show up in the reflection in the mirror? dllu (t,c) 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Answer The explanation is given in the {{Retouched}} template, in the file page : The camera and its tripod reflected in the mirrors have been deleted in post-process. To achieve this purpose, two pictures have been taken from different positions, targeting the same direction. Then, both images have been superimposed and the content replaced in each. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very good technical and compositional realization of the Droste effect. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Fascinating, I wouldn't have imagined you could get this effect without using bellows or a tilt-shift lens! Do you mind letting me know if I got your method right: 1) you took two images, both centred on the mirror, one with the camera in the middle of the room, one with the camera slightly shifted (to the left, judging by the slight offset in the reflection?); 2) you used the first image for the room and the second one for the reflection? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! Yes, exactly, you got everything right, except for the slight offset in the reflection, which is probably caused by imperfect alignment of the mirrors opposite each other, rather than by camera shift. The second image is used just to compensate for the small area where the camera appears through the mirror. This involves “filling” this part with the (hidden) furniture or sink. The offset of the contour of the door or the wooden table opposite is not impacted.-- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, I had wrongly assumed that the camera was completely off the reflection on the second image (probably not even possible, given the wide focal length), but I get it now. Nice, I need to try this out :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Laos well represented with Basile. ★ 12:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The open doors make me uncomfortable, especially the one on the right that seems more prominent, but what makes me feel negative is the trash can under the sink cabinet, it seems to be in an inappropriate place and without an apparent function, it makes me uncomfortable. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, but I don't get your point about the trash can. This is where you find trash cans in hotel rooms usually - if I am looking for one in a hotel room, I look under the sink first. This is where most people need it - be it for tissues, for packaging of hygenic items, or other stuff. Why do you think it is an inappropriate place? Kritzolina (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I hadn't bothered looking at this in detail, but I agree with Wilfredo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Neither the trash can nor the open doors take away much from the image, imo.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I love the infinite mirror reflection effect. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fresh bilberries picked in Tuntorp 4.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 21:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Bilberries are the Scandinavian version of blueberries. There is an ancient tradition of picking them in our woods, and in the old days the dried berries were a staple in most Swedish kitchens. They have been made known to the rest of the world through the Vasaloppet cross-country ski race, where the participants are served traditional hot bilberry soup. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support These look tasty. --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, they were! :-) After they were cleaned and ready to be served, they looked like this (sound on). Half went with ice cream and the rest into a pie. --Cart (talk) 23:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Appealing presentation and very good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This reminds me of my vacation in Finland last summer. Nordic forests are full of them. Good quality and composition.-- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Beautiful presentation with attractive color contrasts; works as a rustic, appealing product photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Delicious looking! Even if I don't like bilberries :D --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 23:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 06:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support looks like caviar. Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 19:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose No wow IMO, and distracting wire. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Grote sponszwam (Sparassis crispa). 09-11-2023. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 07:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Sparassidaceae
Info Sparassis crispa in natural habitat. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 12:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Wonderful contrasting autumn textures. --Cart (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support M series have pleasant color. --Mile (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support But it's a strange way to serve farfalle pasta. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Impressively detailed structures. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Delicious.--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Appetizing, per Ermell and Charles. Also nice light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Superb stacking brings out the beauty of the fungus. --Tagooty (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 20:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question Would you consider flipping it 90 degrees, for greater ease in viewing the fresco? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 05:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The colours could be a bit more vivid --Llez (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question Underexposed? ★ 20:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Low contrast and underexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Thanks for improve the contrast --Wilfredor (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Better now. ★ 14:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral It feels like the roof lines of the building are not straight. But as the image was taken technically well, I will not oppose --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pez lija pintado (Aluterus scriptus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-19, DD 47.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 19:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Monacanthidae_(Filefish)
Info Scrawled filefish (Aluterus scriptus), Red Sea, Egypt. It's a medium size fish which can grow up to 110 centimetres (3.6 ft) in length and can be found in the tropical waters from the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. A. scriptus is omnivorous and have a large choice for its meals like small crustaceans, algae, gorgonians, sea anemones, tunicates, fire coral, seagrasses and hydrozoans. It's diurnal, demersal, solitary and shy with divers. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Beautiful fish, blends in pretty well with its surroundings but still set off well, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I think the blue color of the fish is a striking element of the composition. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 12:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Кабан у лісі.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 13:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
Info created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good-looking pig, nicely framed with the two trees. Is it carrying the stick to use for a nest or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The stick is probably just a mishap from its recent rummaging around on the ground. These guys are notorious for disturbing soil as they look for things to eat. They are a big problem in Sweden since they get into peoples' gardens and tear them up. One family of these pigs can demolish a big lawn in just one night etc. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Good framing and the twig is very telling of their behavior. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice, clear scenery, with the blurry left tree as an interfering element creating a nice depth. I also agree with Ikan Kekek's and Cart's support reasons. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Appealing view point and consistent depth of field. Unusual twig that gives an extra touch of authenticity -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Gyrostat (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very difficult and dangerous to photograph --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Small wild boars such as this one are not really dangerous. Old males or females with piglets could be. Yann (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support --Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lord Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett Dunsany by Morrall-Hoole Studios.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 02:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
Info created by Morrall-Hoole Studios - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good retouching of a valuable picture; interesting writer. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 12:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:RhB Alvra Filisur - Alvaneu.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 19:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment The Landwasser viaduct is a well-photographed subject, but this perspective from the drone isn't very common and with the fresh snow I just couldn't resist.
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Very nice but there are several other FPs already. Two are yours and great. This one should be delisted please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The shooting moment is well chosen, with the red train - half hidden in the tunnel - moving in the snowy landscape. Also the deepness of the background helps the composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Excellent Kabelleger quality: Very vivid colors, great contrast and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Lights, camera... action! --Cart (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 12:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --A.Savin 21:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per others, including Charles. Charles, why don't you nominate some for delisting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because any I have nominated have attracted keep votes. And it is time consuming. I just think whoever wants to increase the number of FPs of a particular subject will have reviewed the existng FPs and should be the one to suggest a delist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The snow with the train gives the scenery something cozy --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support at this point I don't even have to look at the images by Kabelleger before voting support. I'm exciting for when (if at all) he visits India! The snowy trains of Shimla and Kashmir, steam engines of misty Darjeeling and Ooty, the vistas of Kangra, Konkan and the desert trains of the Thar, and so so much more await! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 13:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Serranidae (Serranids)
Info Coney (Cephalopholis fulva) camouflaged on a rock, Fernando de Noronha Marine National Park, Brazil. The park covers part of the island of Fernando de Noronha, a municipality of Pernambuco, and has an area of 10,927.64 hectares (27,002.8 acres). Created and uploaded by Jpdandretta - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I like the composition; it's a classic example of marine/underwater camouflage. ★ 15:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment The idea is good, but the quality of the picture does not seem sufficient to me. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I think people might be harder on this image than it deserves. Look what happens when you give it a bit of TLC in an editing program: Edited version. I think that could go nicely into the Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Fish gallery. What do you think? --Cart (talk) 00:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info Added as alternative, thanks Cart. ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Yes, I prefer this version, with more contrast between the green algae and the background. Thank you. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Quality and composition are not good enough. --Tagooty (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced. This kind of fish usually hides in the reefs and hunts by night, so that I wouldn't call the scene here his habitat where it camouflages. It rather follows other predators to take advantage of prey escaping from them. And as said, quality and compo are not convincing to me. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:043 Elephant family at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 13:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Not so keen on the cropped elephant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose as above and the grass obscuring the others. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Not enough space around: bad crop left, above, and right. Yann (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Crop, and vegetation in the foreground. --Tagooty (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per Tagooty --imehling (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Thank you for your reviews. I understand that one of the three elephants beeing half in the frame can be disturbing for some of you at first glance. However the focus is more on the baby elephant that is at the center of the frame and that is surounded by his family, the two others elephants protecting the baby from both sides like guardians. Also the mother can be seen uncropped behind the two others. As for the vegetation, two elephants are simply walking over it and are still very visible above it. The vegetation also provides a sense of depth to the picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Bokeh
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
InfoThe coolness of the night caused small drops of water, called "Dew", to form on the glass of the car, which I photographed, illuminated by the sun. The dew point is the temperature at which the air becomes saturated with water vapor and water drops begin to form, i.e. condensation. Condensation occurs when the air temperature drops, reducing the amount of energy available to keep water in the form of vapor. A natural phenomenon from which a beautiful image to see is born. Inside each drop you can see concentric circles forming the drop itself.

A photo of the same type has already been recognized as featured, but I propose this one that I took later because it seems even more visually beautiful to me.

Oppose I opposed the last one and I cannot think why we would want to promote another. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is for sure and I might even support this one if the other is removed... 18:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)

ːIn the meantime, let's see if someone else votes for this image, if this one passes, then we will intervene on the other one.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support. Yes, this is beautiful. I think the two pictures are different enough in appearance and composition to both be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much, I think so too, but I wrote about the presence of the other photo out of honesty. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hôtel Le Concorde Québec.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:51:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice composition! ★ 13:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice slice of life. The hotel looks like it's about to take off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tmv (talk) 00:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Over-saturation. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Voted --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
~~Oppose~~ As said, oversaturated, buildings leaning clockwise. --Mile (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Its not oversatured, it was natural colors. Look for images on the internet of what autumn is like in Canada, the colors here are very very vibrant --Wilfredor (talk) 11:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about the buildings, its not PD but rotation is due. Mile (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done @PetarM: Verticals are fixed now, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 16:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

~~Oppose~~ Pretty but it lacks sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done @Poco a poco: Please take another look --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to

Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought about doing that too but the image would look very elongated like those phone images. Also leaving the tree in the foreground shows the distance and that there are more trees around. It is difficult to please everyone, for some it is clear and for others it is too clear. Generally I do not apply any filters to my photos, only when they request it, as was your case. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weak support If you insist its not oversaturated, I overlook it and this one is nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Motif not special enough IMO. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Pretty but not special. --Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support beautiful --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Parc publique du Bois-de-Coulonge, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:50:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose until the hallooing is taken care of. Nice shot otherwise - Benh (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 13:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Long exposure would be even better, clouds, water... --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The subject is so striking that I can't resist. I wish the light had been better. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Cool topiary! I don't love the right crop, but I find this picture irresistible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Жук стрибун.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 13:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cicindelidae (Tiger Beetles) (section does not exist yet)
Info created by Сергій Мірошник - uploaded by Сергій Мірошник - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nice idea, but depth of field is too narrow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I agree. I'd like to see more of the insect sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Really a pity about this picture that the depth of field is insufficient, because composition, subject, and moment are great. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Looking at their other images submitted to QI, there may be some creative post-processing here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nobody said that photographing insects was easy, but unfortunately there is a lack of depth of field here, additionally some kind of filter makes the hairs of the insect represented without real textures. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info This is a beetle (order Coleoptera), not a bee, wasp, or ant (order Hymenoptera). The intended gallery is wrong. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. Gallery fixed. --Cart (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose The dof is really narrow and it ends rather abruptly, that makes it look weird. Also I'm not a fan of this overly dark/black editing that seems to be so popular in East European countries. --Cart (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 10:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cavoliniidae
Info This small shell (1.3 cm) has an unusual shape for a gastropod. It belongs to a small group of gastropods that do not crawl on the substrate, but are found floating freely in warmer seas around the world. The animal's body is also unusual, as it looks more like a butterfly than a snail. Hence the name “Sea butterflies” for this group of gastropods; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Unusual shape of shell. Mix of ray, snail and turtle? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Right, the shapes are noticeably different depending on the viewing direction. Valuable, good picture; thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 17:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose sorry, but it's not sharp enough for me at full reso. -- Ivar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    - Comment Your professional level camera will produce much sharper pictures than an enthusiast's crop frame camera (one that I used to use). Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Luzern asv2022-10 Gotthardgebäude img03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 23:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Switzerland
Info Representative conference hall of the former Gotthard Railway headquarters building in Lucerne, which is now used by a branch of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. All by me, --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very nice interior scene with warm wood tones. The perspective creates a good three-dimensional impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I dunno... The light is nice, but I feel like the noise reduction is a bit heavy...--Peulle (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought this too but maybe it's that the wood is very well crafted? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose Look like stacked image, not handsfree. I dislike composition, tight crop bellow and choped desk on left. You could move camera a bit down, and a bit to the right side. Or 12, 13 mm. Colors-reflexions are not so attractive. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Looks good to me. I'd love for more of the picture frame to be even sharper, but it's a nice composition to me, a beautiful room with beautiful furniture, and I really don't see what more is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top in my view. The seat legs lack space in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose as per Basile, crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wooden pig merry-go-round in Brastad 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 13:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
Info I have been photographing playgrounds for a while, and this crazy-looking pig has haunted me ever since. I hope the kids aren't too traumatized by it. This farm-themed playground was built in 2018, based on ideas and designs made by the fifth-graders of the local Stångenäs school; many of them live on farms in the area. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support horror-film material. Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ..."there is a distinct lack of deranged wooden pigs on FPC..." and this nomination is a good way to mitigate the fact --Kritzolina (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support OK perhaps not quite as horrible as this pig made of tires, but still quite good. --A.Savin 23:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Something out of the ordinary, definitely an eye-catcher of a different kind. Probably you'll get a little scared at first in the twilight :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The background is very cluttered. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per above. At least some background separation would have been nice (not that it would have changed my vote tbh) - Benh (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The diagonal piece of wood is questionable to include, but it rhymes with the slide. But the truly weird pig is the star, and otherwise, per other supporters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Cluttered composition --Tagooty (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Yes, the background is rather busy, but that's the way playgrounds work. I also like that it provides context for the pig. The place is tidy, still in daily use and it's clear that the pig is not a prop at some abandoned amusement park or something like that. --Cart (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Tagooty. -- Karelj (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A8124.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 10:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Diomedeidae (Albatross)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose The bird is great, but the waves didn't cooperate. The unfocused swell down right ruins the composition for me. Too bad. --Cart (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support It's a nice shot in itself but the tip of the wing lying between swells makes it even more incredible in my view, and shows the bird was flying very low - Benh (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very good, highly professional capture. The natural blur gives the scene a lot of depth. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The most common background for birds in flight photography is a boring blue sky background. In my opinion the waves in this photo give a very welcome sense of depth to the subject as well as a context to the image. Also, shooting birds in flight with a background behind them is a lot more difficult than simple plain blue sky as it is generally more difficult to keep the subject in focus in this scenario. Also the camera seems very close to water level, which makes this shot even harder to do. In summary, I think it is a very good shot of a bird in flight. --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The level of blur of the wave is a bit distracting, however I agree with Benh and Giles Laurent -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support compo as first --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Great shot. --Gyrostat (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ★ 20:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delisting candidates[edit]