Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要[edit]
推薦にあたって[edit]
推薦者のためのガイドライン[edit]
まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦[edit]
推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票[edit]
投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} ( Support、 Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} ( Oppose、 Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} ( Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} ( Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外[edit]
時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}} Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}} Delist 及び {{除外}} Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針[edit]
総則[edit]
- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール[edit]
候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist ( Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに[edit]
どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目[edit]
- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次[edit]
秀逸な画像の候補[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:View of Pfronten 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 09:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:023 African pygmy kingfisher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
- Info No FPs of this genus (Ispidina) and of this species (Ispidina picta). Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Olive Groves Fields Spello Umbria Sep23 A7C 07785.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 06:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
- Info View of olive groves and fields in the foothills and valleys of Umbria, SE of Spello. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Didn't expect to be taken in by this, but the landscape is very pleasant, and the composition with layering diagonals in the cool light works perfectly. --Cart (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:2023 Grindavik eruption.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 01:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Volcanism
- Info created by the Icelandic Meteorological Office- uploaded by WeatherWriter - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not under a free license, and too small by today standards. Yann (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Common kingfisher in Japan, December 2023 - 4915.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 19:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
- Info c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Will support with enthusiasm but I think it is oversaturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Done. --Laitche (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic capture! Great shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Ermell (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Info Color adjustment applied. --Laitche (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Graceful Pitta 0A2A8564.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 16:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pittidae_(Pittas)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Another difficult bird. Slightly underexposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Given the settings showing up in exif data (1/10 sec, f/4, 3,200 ISO, 600 mm), this shot might have been difficult to take, in a very dark place, and certainly with a good tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support A bit strong vignetting but still very good picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support as per Giles Laurent. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Szénrakodó-esztergom.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 13:02:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Hungary (missing title)
- Info created & uploaded by Krischneider Péter - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:White-winged forest sylph (Ceratrichia nothus nothus) underside Nyamebe Bepo.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 21:43:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
- Info No FPs of this genus of small skipper butterflies from West Africa. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and high level of detail with both antennas in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Male Bush Elephant Crossing Road Kafue Jul23 A7R 05179.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 08:49:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info A young male African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) striding across the forest road in early morning, trunk raised to smell, Kafue National Park, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Elephants are so easy to photograph (and many FPs); the composition needs to be more interesting with the animal being on a road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per Yann. ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charles, I miss the extraordinary part of this image (lighting, detail, activity,...). I don't think either that the human-made road helps here. Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I understand that it must be a great experience to see a wild elephant this close, but there is nothing of that little extra in the composition, light or the things that would make this stand out. And the road doesn't help here. --Cart (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Table-banquette by Annie Tribel 1968 - Design Museum Brussels Belgium.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 02:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support A nice photo though clipped whites is a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 05:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Looks timelessly futuristic and could have come from the set design for the Hilton of Space Station 5 in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Great symmetrical capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 03:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Others
- Info Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River, in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Fishing activity on the Doce River has been significantly affected after the 2015 environment disaster, when the failure of a dam released 43.7 million cubic metres of mine tailings into the river, causing a toxic mudflow to pollute its waters; the mudflow consequently reached the Atlantic Ocean 17 days later. This image illustrates all the drama that has occurred since then. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support You can say "too minimalist composition" but there's a whole aforementioned dramatic context behind the image. -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment No reason for black and white, imho. --Laitche (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Original version[edit]
- Info @Laitche: Right, I just uploaded the original version; let's see what others think about this (P.S.: I still prefer the B&W style, in my opinion). ★ 09:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Pristimantis elegans Chingaza.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 11:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Strabomantidae (Frogs)
- Info This species is endemic to the Eastern Andes of Colombia and is IUCN red list Vulnerable. It was found by sound triangulation on a rainy afternoon. No FPs of this family of frogs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Focus stacking at this distance is not easy, and here the result is very clean. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional image of a rare subject. --Tagooty (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment A great, sharp photo of the Pristimantis elegans, certainly not taken under easy conditions. There are some bright dots/traces on dark ground in the right and upper right part of the image. If you like, I can remove them and provide you the edit via transfer link. But if the dots are supposed to be like that, no offense, I just want to help :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- White spots pretty much as RAW, but brightened during stacking, so I've toned them back thanks. Streaks are rain. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Thanks very much for your editing, Charles. But I only meant the small white dots on the dark background on the right and not the reflections on the foliage. I have now annotated it above. I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly and we misunderstood each other as a result. I took the liberty of retouching yesterday's version (revision from 22:13, Dec 18, 2023). Please feel free to use it if you like: Link to download. I apologize for the misunderstanding. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Akelei Blüte geschlossen stacking-20230506-RM-120202.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 15:21:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ranunculaceae
- Info Closed columbine flower. Focus stack of 15 images: All by me -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Another beautiful semi-contre-jour take with great technical and compositional quality. Thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very classy. --Cart (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support A bit cramped composition but nice. --Laitche (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Dachstuhl des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02596-HDR RAW-Export.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 18:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
- Info Image depicting a ladder and window as symbol; created in the attic of Hof town hall, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The overexposure was clear in this photo, an attempt was made to reduce it by lowering the lighting until the white was transformed into gray. And no wow for the composition --Wilfredor (talk) 06:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Bright part of the image wasn't handled very well and the processing treatment has left strange artifacts around the window frame. Maybe a blue sky or an interesting cloud would be better than a rainy grey day? Out of interest, what was the symbolism supposed to be here? BigDom (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Perhaps not the best angle for this. When faced with a very bright opening, it's often better to go for the things that the light illuminates and let the bright window be implied. So many cool angles and lines in the scene that could be used for that. Making the light grey doesn't help either. --Cart (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for the critics :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Riomaggiore SE Wide Cinque Terre Italy Sep23 A7C 07305.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 15:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
- Info The colourful village of Riomaggiore on a cloudy afternoon. One of the five villages of Cinque Terre, Italy which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The weather did not help in this photo, it also looks unclear, possibly due to lens distortion or lack of luminosity. Also the composition seems to try to place the sea and the houses, but neither of them seems like a main subject, the houses look cut off and the sea too. The contrast and low exposure make this colorful scene look like a Gothic city. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately I agree with Wilfredo regarding the composition and the fact that the weather was not on your side this time, bad luck. BigDom (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. To me the beauty is the bright colourful buildings despite the overcast sky. --Tagooty (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre, Málaga, España, 2023-05-20, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 08:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain
- Info Ceiling of the Oratory of Saint Mary Queen and Mother, Málaga, Spain. The church was constructed in 2008 and is host of the Confraternity of the Sorrows. The paintings in the ceiling, done with acrylic paint, are work of Raúl Berzosa Fernández and were executed in different phases between 2008 and 2014. The 140 square metres (1,500 sq ft) surface is dedicated to the Coronation of the Virgin. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support A very impressive, beautiful ceiling fresco, excellently captured; a fine example of comparatively new paintings of this type in a modern church building. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Unusual to see a modern interpretation. The 21st Century people are so well executed. (the photo's OK too!) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Striking image --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The mural on the downside of the floor in the top of the image makes it unique --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support for the composition and technical quality but clarity needed on the copyright status. {{FoP-Spain}} (which is missing by the way) only mentions outdoor artworks such as those in parks, streets and other thoroughfares. What is the situation for indoor artworks or are these ones known to be freely licensed? BigDom (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Template added, thank you. Poco a poco (talk)
- Support Modern frescos in this "old" style are an acquired taste. To me they look rather tacky, but it's a happy tacky that lots of devout people evidently like, and this is a really good photo of a great example of it. --Cart (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Infinity mirror, hand-washing sink and wardrobes in the spa of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 22:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nicely done. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question How did you not show up in the reflection in the mirror? dllu (t,c) 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Answer The explanation is given in the {{Retouched}} template, in the file page : The camera and its tripod reflected in the mirrors have been deleted in post-process. To achieve this purpose, two pictures have been taken from different positions, targeting the same direction. Then, both images have been superimposed and the content replaced in each. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very good technical and compositional realization of the Droste effect. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, I wouldn't have imagined you could get this effect without using bellows or a tilt-shift lens! Do you mind letting me know if I got your method right: 1) you took two images, both centred on the mirror, one with the camera in the middle of the room, one with the camera slightly shifted (to the left, judging by the slight offset in the reflection?); 2) you used the first image for the room and the second one for the reflection? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, exactly, you got everything right, except for the slight offset in the reflection, which is probably caused by imperfect alignment of the mirrors opposite each other, rather than by camera shift. The second image is used just to compensate for the small area where the camera appears through the mirror. This involves “filling” this part with the (hidden) furniture or sink. The offset of the contour of the door or the wooden table opposite is not impacted.-- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I had wrongly assumed that the camera was completely off the reflection on the second image (probably not even possible, given the wide focal length), but I get it now. Nice, I need to try this out :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Laos well represented with Basile. ★ 12:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The open doors make me uncomfortable, especially the one on the right that seems more prominent, but what makes me feel negative is the trash can under the sink cabinet, it seems to be in an inappropriate place and without an apparent function, it makes me uncomfortable. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't get your point about the trash can. This is where you find trash cans in hotel rooms usually - if I am looking for one in a hotel room, I look under the sink first. This is where most people need it - be it for tissues, for packaging of hygenic items, or other stuff. Why do you think it is an inappropriate place? Kritzolina (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I hadn't bothered looking at this in detail, but I agree with Wilfredo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Neither the trash can nor the open doors take away much from the image, imo.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support I love the infinite mirror reflection effect. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Fresh bilberries picked in Tuntorp 4.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 21:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Bilberries are the Scandinavian version of blueberries. There is an ancient tradition of picking them in our woods, and in the old days the dried berries were a staple in most Swedish kitchens. They have been made known to the rest of the world through the Vasaloppet cross-country ski race, where the participants are served traditional hot bilberry soup. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support These look tasty. --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appealing presentation and very good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support This reminds me of my vacation in Finland last summer. Nordic forests are full of them. Good quality and composition.-- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful presentation with attractive color contrasts; works as a rustic, appealing product photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Delicious looking! Even if I don't like bilberries :D --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 23:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 06:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support looks like caviar. Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 19:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow IMO, and distracting wire. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Grote sponszwam (Sparassis crispa). 09-11-2023. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 07:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Sparassidaceae
- Info Sparassis crispa in natural habitat. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful contrasting autumn textures. --Cart (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support M series have pleasant color. --Mile (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support But it's a strange way to serve farfalle pasta. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Impressively detailed structures. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Delicious.--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appetizing, per Ermell and Charles. Also nice light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Superb stacking brings out the beauty of the fungus. --Tagooty (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 20:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question Would you consider flipping it 90 degrees, for greater ease in viewing the fresco? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 05:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The colours could be a bit more vivid --Llez (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question Underexposed? ★ 20:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Low contrast and underexposed--Wilfredor (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)- Done. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Better now. ★ 14:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral It feels like the roof lines of the building are not straight. But as the image was taken technically well, I will not oppose --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Pez lija pintado (Aluterus scriptus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-19, DD 47.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 19:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Monacanthidae_(Filefish)
- Info Scrawled filefish (Aluterus scriptus), Red Sea, Egypt. It's a medium size fish which can grow up to 110 centimetres (3.6 ft) in length and can be found in the tropical waters from the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. A. scriptus is omnivorous and have a large choice for its meals like small crustaceans, algae, gorgonians, sea anemones, tunicates, fire coral, seagrasses and hydrozoans. It's diurnal, demersal, solitary and shy with divers. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful fish, blends in pretty well with its surroundings but still set off well, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support I think the blue color of the fish is a striking element of the composition. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Кабан у лісі.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 13:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good-looking pig, nicely framed with the two trees. Is it carrying the stick to use for a nest or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- The stick is probably just a mishap from its recent rummaging around on the ground. These guys are notorious for disturbing soil as they look for things to eat. They are a big problem in Sweden since they get into peoples' gardens and tear them up. One family of these pigs can demolish a big lawn in just one night etc. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good framing and the twig is very telling of their behavior. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice, clear scenery, with the blurry left tree as an interfering element creating a nice depth. I also agree with Ikan Kekek's and Cart's support reasons. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appealing view point and consistent depth of field. Unusual twig that gives an extra touch of authenticity -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Gyrostat (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very difficult and dangerous to photograph --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Lord Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett Dunsany by Morrall-Hoole Studios.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 02:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
- Info created by Morrall-Hoole Studios - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good retouching of a valuable picture; interesting writer. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:RhB Alvra Filisur - Alvaneu.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 19:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The Landwasser viaduct is a well-photographed subject, but this perspective from the drone isn't very common and with the fresh snow I just couldn't resist.
- Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice but there are several other FPs already. Two are yours and great. This one should be delisted please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The shooting moment is well chosen, with the red train - half hidden in the tunnel - moving in the snowy landscape. Also the deepness of the background helps the composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Excellent Kabelleger quality: Very vivid colors, great contrast and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Lights, camera... action! --Cart (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per others, including Charles. Charles, why don't you nominate some for delisting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because any I have nominated have attracted keep votes. And it is time consuming. I just think whoever wants to increase the number of FPs of a particular subject will have reviewed the existng FPs and should be the one to suggest a delist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The snow with the train gives the scenery something cozy --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support at this point I don't even have to look at the images by Kabelleger before voting support. I'm exciting for when (if at all) he visits India! The snowy trains of Shimla and Kashmir, steam engines of misty Darjeeling and Ooty, the vistas of Kangra, Konkan and the desert trains of the Thar, and so so much more await! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 13:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Serranidae (Serranids)
- Info Coney (Cephalopholis fulva) camouflaged on a rock, Fernando de Noronha Marine National Park, Brazil. The park covers part of the island of Fernando de Noronha, a municipality of Pernambuco, and has an area of 10,927.64 hectares (27,002.8 acres). Created and uploaded by Jpdandretta - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- I like the composition; it's a classic example of marine/underwater camouflage. ★ 15:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The idea is good, but the quality of the picture does not seem sufficient to me. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think people might be harder on this image than it deserves. Look what happens when you give it a bit of TLC in an editing program: Edited version. I think that could go nicely into the Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Fish gallery. What do you think? --Cart (talk) 00:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Added as alternative, thanks Cart. ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Yes, I prefer this version, with more contrast between the green algae and the background. Thank you. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality and composition are not good enough. --Tagooty (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced. This kind of fish usually hides in the reefs and hunts by night, so that I wouldn't call the scene here his habitat where it camouflages. It rather follows other predators to take advantage of prey escaping from them. And as said, quality and compo are not convincing to me. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:043 Elephant family at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not so keen on the cropped elephant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as above and the grass obscuring the others. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not enough space around: bad crop left, above, and right. Yann (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop, and vegetation in the foreground. --Tagooty (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tagooty --imehling (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your reviews. I understand that one of the three elephants beeing half in the frame can be disturbing for some of you at first glance. However the focus is more on the baby elephant that is at the center of the frame and that is surounded by his family, the two others elephants protecting the baby from both sides like guardians. Also the mother can be seen uncropped behind the two others. As for the vegetation, two elephants are simply walking over it and are still very visible above it. The vegetation also provides a sense of depth to the picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Bokeh
- Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- InfoThe coolness of the night caused small drops of water, called "Dew", to form on the glass of the car, which I photographed, illuminated by the sun. The dew point is the temperature at which the air becomes saturated with water vapor and water drops begin to form, i.e. condensation. Condensation occurs when the air temperature drops, reducing the amount of energy available to keep water in the form of vapor. A natural phenomenon from which a beautiful image to see is born. Inside each drop you can see concentric circles forming the drop itself.
A photo of the same type has already been recognized as featured, but I propose this one that I took later because it seems even more visually beautiful to me.
- Oppose I opposed the last one and I cannot think why we would want to promote another. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is for sure and I might even support this one if the other is removed... 18:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
- ːIn the meantime, let's see if someone else votes for this image, if this one passes, then we will intervene on the other one.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Yes, this is beautiful. I think the two pictures are different enough in appearance and composition to both be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I think so too, but I wrote about the presence of the other photo out of honesty. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Hôtel Le Concorde Québec.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:51:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition! ★ 13:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice slice of life. The hotel looks like it's about to take off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tmv (talk) 00:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment Over-saturation. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Voted --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)OpposeAs said, oversaturated, buildings leaning clockwise. --Mile (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
OpposePretty but it lacks sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Poco a poco: Please take another look --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I thought about doing that too but the image would look very elongated like those phone images. Also leaving the tree in the foreground shows the distance and that there are more trees around. It is difficult to please everyone, for some it is clear and for others it is too clear. Generally I do not apply any filters to my photos, only when they request it, as was your case. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Poco a poco: Please take another look --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support If you insist its not oversaturated, I overlook it and this one is nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif not special enough IMO. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty but not special. --Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support beautiful --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Parc publique du Bois-de-Coulonge, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:50:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose until the hallooing is taken care of. Nice shot otherwise - Benh (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Long exposure would be even better, clouds, water... --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The subject is so striking that I can't resist. I wish the light had been better. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Cool topiary! I don't love the right crop, but I find this picture irresistible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Жук стрибун.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 13:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cicindelidae (Tiger Beetles) (section does not exist yet)
- Info created by Сергій Мірошник - uploaded by Сергій Мірошник - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but depth of field is too narrow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree. I'd like to see more of the insect sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Really a pity about this picture that the depth of field is insufficient, because composition, subject, and moment are great. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Looking at their other images submitted to QI, there may be some creative post-processing here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nobody said that photographing insects was easy, but unfortunately there is a lack of depth of field here, additionally some kind of filter makes the hairs of the insect represented without real textures. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Info This is a beetle (order Coleoptera), not a bee, wasp, or ant (order Hymenoptera). The intended gallery is wrong. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The dof is really narrow and it ends rather abruptly, that makes it look weird. Also I'm not a fan of this overly dark/black editing that seems to be so popular in East European countries. --Cart (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 10:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cavoliniidae
- Info This small shell (1.3 cm) has an unusual shape for a gastropod. It belongs to a small group of gastropods that do not crawl on the substrate, but are found floating freely in warmer seas around the world. The animal's body is also unusual, as it looks more like a butterfly than a snail. Hence the name “Sea butterflies” for this group of gastropods; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Unusual shape of shell. Mix of ray, snail and turtle? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Right, the shapes are noticeably different depending on the viewing direction. Valuable, good picture; thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but it's not sharp enough for me at full reso. -- Ivar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Your professional level camera will produce much sharper pictures than an enthusiast's crop frame camera (one that I used to use). Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Luzern asv2022-10 Gotthardgebäude img03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 23:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Switzerland
- Info Representative conference hall of the former Gotthard Railway headquarters building in Lucerne, which is now used by a branch of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. All by me, --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very nice interior scene with warm wood tones. The perspective creates a good three-dimensional impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I dunno... The light is nice, but I feel like the noise reduction is a bit heavy...--Peulle (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Look like stacked image, not handsfree. I dislike composition, tight crop bellow and choped desk on left. You could move camera a bit down, and a bit to the right side. Or 12, 13 mm. Colors-reflexions are not so attractive. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me. I'd love for more of the picture frame to be even sharper, but it's a nice composition to me, a beautiful room with beautiful furniture, and I really don't see what more is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top in my view. The seat legs lack space in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Basile, crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Wooden pig merry-go-round in Brastad 3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 13:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
- Info I have been photographing playgrounds for a while, and this crazy-looking pig has haunted me ever since. I hope the kids aren't too traumatized by it. This farm-themed playground was built in 2018, based on ideas and designs made by the fifth-graders of the local Stångenäs school; many of them live on farms in the area. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support horror-film material. Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ..."there is a distinct lack of deranged wooden pigs on FPC..." and this nomination is a good way to mitigate the fact --Kritzolina (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support OK perhaps not quite as horrible as this pig made of tires, but still quite good. --A.Savin 23:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Something out of the ordinary, definitely an eye-catcher of a different kind. Probably you'll get a little scared at first in the twilight :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is very cluttered. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. At least some background separation would have been nice (not that it would have changed my vote tbh) - Benh (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The diagonal piece of wood is questionable to include, but it rhymes with the slide. But the truly weird pig is the star, and otherwise, per other supporters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Cluttered composition --Tagooty (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, the background is rather busy, but that's the way playgrounds work. I also like that it provides context for the pig. The place is tidy, still in daily use and it's clear that the pig is not a prop at some abandoned amusement park or something like that. --Cart (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tagooty. -- Karelj (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A8124.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 10:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Diomedeidae (Albatross)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The bird is great, but the waves didn't cooperate. The unfocused swell down right ruins the composition for me. Too bad. --Cart (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support It's a nice shot in itself but the tip of the wing lying between swells makes it even more incredible in my view, and shows the bird was flying very low - Benh (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very good, highly professional capture. The natural blur gives the scene a lot of depth. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The most common background for birds in flight photography is a boring blue sky background. In my opinion the waves in this photo give a very welcome sense of depth to the subject as well as a context to the image. Also, shooting birds in flight with a background behind them is a lot more difficult than simple plain blue sky as it is generally more difficult to keep the subject in focus in this scenario. Also the camera seems very close to water level, which makes this shot even harder to do. In summary, I think it is a very good shot of a bird in flight. --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The level of blur of the wave is a bit distracting, however I agree with Benh and Giles Laurent -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support compo as first --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. --Gyrostat (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:View of Pfronten 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 09:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:023 African pygmy kingfisher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
- Info No FPs of this genus (Ispidina) and of this species (Ispidina picta). Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Olive Groves Fields Spello Umbria Sep23 A7C 07785.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 06:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
- Info View of olive groves and fields in the foothills and valleys of Umbria, SE of Spello. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Didn't expect to be taken in by this, but the landscape is very pleasant, and the composition with layering diagonals in the cool light works perfectly. --Cart (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:2023 Grindavik eruption.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 01:56:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Volcanism
- Info created by the Icelandic Meteorological Office- uploaded by WeatherWriter - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- WeatherWriter (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not under a free license, and too small by today standards. Yann (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Common kingfisher in Japan, December 2023 - 4915.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 19:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
- Info c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Will support with enthusiasm but I think it is oversaturated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: Done. --Laitche (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic capture! Great shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Ermell (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Exemplary great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 07:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Info Color adjustment applied. --Laitche (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Graceful Pitta 0A2A8564.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 16:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pittidae_(Pittas)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Another difficult bird. Slightly underexposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Given the settings showing up in exif data (1/10 sec, f/4, 3,200 ISO, 600 mm), this shot might have been difficult to take, in a very dark place, and certainly with a good tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support A bit strong vignetting but still very good picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support as per Giles Laurent. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Szénrakodó-esztergom.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 13:02:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Hungary (missing title)
- Info created & uploaded by Krischneider Péter - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:White-winged forest sylph (Ceratrichia nothus nothus) underside Nyamebe Bepo.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 21:43:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
- Info No FPs of this genus of small skipper butterflies from West Africa. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice light and high level of detail with both antennas in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Male Bush Elephant Crossing Road Kafue Jul23 A7R 05179.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 08:49:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
- Info A young male African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) striding across the forest road in early morning, trunk raised to smell, Kafue National Park, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Elephants are so easy to photograph (and many FPs); the composition needs to be more interesting with the animal being on a road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Per Yann. ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charles, I miss the extraordinary part of this image (lighting, detail, activity,...). I don't think either that the human-made road helps here. Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I understand that it must be a great experience to see a wild elephant this close, but there is nothing of that little extra in the composition, light or the things that would make this stand out. And the road doesn't help here. --Cart (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Table-banquette by Annie Tribel 1968 - Design Museum Brussels Belgium.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 02:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support A nice photo though clipped whites is a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 05:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Looks timelessly futuristic and could have come from the set design for the Hilton of Space Station 5 in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Great symmetrical capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 03:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Others
- Info Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River, in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Fishing activity on the Doce River has been significantly affected after the 2015 environment disaster, when the failure of a dam released 43.7 million cubic metres of mine tailings into the river, causing a toxic mudflow to pollute its waters; the mudflow consequently reached the Atlantic Ocean 17 days later. This image illustrates all the drama that has occurred since then. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support You can say "too minimalist composition" but there's a whole aforementioned dramatic context behind the image. -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment No reason for black and white, imho. --Laitche (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Original version[edit]
- Info @Laitche: Right, I just uploaded the original version; let's see what others think about this (P.S.: I still prefer the B&W style, in my opinion). ★ 09:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Pristimantis elegans Chingaza.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 11:29:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Strabomantidae (Frogs)
- Info This species is endemic to the Eastern Andes of Colombia and is IUCN red list Vulnerable. It was found by sound triangulation on a rainy afternoon. No FPs of this family of frogs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Focus stacking at this distance is not easy, and here the result is very clean. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Exceptional image of a rare subject. --Tagooty (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment A great, sharp photo of the Pristimantis elegans, certainly not taken under easy conditions. There are some bright dots/traces on dark ground in the right and upper right part of the image. If you like, I can remove them and provide you the edit via transfer link. But if the dots are supposed to be like that, no offense, I just want to help :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- White spots pretty much as RAW, but brightened during stacking, so I've toned them back thanks. Streaks are rain. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Thanks very much for your editing, Charles. But I only meant the small white dots on the dark background on the right and not the reflections on the foliage. I have now annotated it above. I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly and we misunderstood each other as a result. I took the liberty of retouching yesterday's version (revision from 22:13, Dec 18, 2023). Please feel free to use it if you like: Link to download. I apologize for the misunderstanding. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Akelei Blüte geschlossen stacking-20230506-RM-120202.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2023 at 15:21:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ranunculaceae
- Info Closed columbine flower. Focus stack of 15 images: All by me -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Another beautiful semi-contre-jour take with great technical and compositional quality. Thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very classy. --Cart (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support A bit cramped composition but nice. --Laitche (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Dachstuhl des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02596-HDR RAW-Export.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 18:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
- Info Image depicting a ladder and window as symbol; created in the attic of Hof town hall, created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The overexposure was clear in this photo, an attempt was made to reduce it by lowering the lighting until the white was transformed into gray. And no wow for the composition --Wilfredor (talk) 06:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Bright part of the image wasn't handled very well and the processing treatment has left strange artifacts around the window frame. Maybe a blue sky or an interesting cloud would be better than a rainy grey day? Out of interest, what was the symbolism supposed to be here? BigDom (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Perhaps not the best angle for this. When faced with a very bright opening, it's often better to go for the things that the light illuminates and let the bright window be implied. So many cool angles and lines in the scene that could be used for that. Making the light grey doesn't help either. --Cart (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for the critics :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Riomaggiore SE Wide Cinque Terre Italy Sep23 A7C 07305.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 15:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Italy
- Info The colourful village of Riomaggiore on a cloudy afternoon. One of the five villages of Cinque Terre, Italy which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The weather did not help in this photo, it also looks unclear, possibly due to lens distortion or lack of luminosity. Also the composition seems to try to place the sea and the houses, but neither of them seems like a main subject, the houses look cut off and the sea too. The contrast and low exposure make this colorful scene look like a Gothic city. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately I agree with Wilfredo regarding the composition and the fact that the weather was not on your side this time, bad luck. BigDom (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. To me the beauty is the bright colourful buildings despite the overcast sky. --Tagooty (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre, Málaga, España, 2023-05-20, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 08:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Spain
- Info Ceiling of the Oratory of Saint Mary Queen and Mother, Málaga, Spain. The church was constructed in 2008 and is host of the Confraternity of the Sorrows. The paintings in the ceiling, done with acrylic paint, are work of Raúl Berzosa Fernández and were executed in different phases between 2008 and 2014. The 140 square metres (1,500 sq ft) surface is dedicated to the Coronation of the Virgin. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support A very impressive, beautiful ceiling fresco, excellently captured; a fine example of comparatively new paintings of this type in a modern church building. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Unusual to see a modern interpretation. The 21st Century people are so well executed. (the photo's OK too!) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 15:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Striking image --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The mural on the downside of the floor in the top of the image makes it unique --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support for the composition and technical quality but clarity needed on the copyright status. {{FoP-Spain}} (which is missing by the way) only mentions outdoor artworks such as those in parks, streets and other thoroughfares. What is the situation for indoor artworks or are these ones known to be freely licensed? BigDom (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Template added, thank you. Poco a poco (talk)
- Support Modern frescos in this "old" style are an acquired taste. To me they look rather tacky, but it's a happy tacky that lots of devout people evidently like, and this is a really good photo of a great example of it. --Cart (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Infinity mirror, hand-washing sink and wardrobes in the spa of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 22:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nicely done. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question How did you not show up in the reflection in the mirror? dllu (t,c) 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Answer The explanation is given in the {{Retouched}} template, in the file page : The camera and its tripod reflected in the mirrors have been deleted in post-process. To achieve this purpose, two pictures have been taken from different positions, targeting the same direction. Then, both images have been superimposed and the content replaced in each. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very good technical and compositional realization of the Droste effect. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, I wouldn't have imagined you could get this effect without using bellows or a tilt-shift lens! Do you mind letting me know if I got your method right: 1) you took two images, both centred on the mirror, one with the camera in the middle of the room, one with the camera slightly shifted (to the left, judging by the slight offset in the reflection?); 2) you used the first image for the room and the second one for the reflection? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, exactly, you got everything right, except for the slight offset in the reflection, which is probably caused by imperfect alignment of the mirrors opposite each other, rather than by camera shift. The second image is used just to compensate for the small area where the camera appears through the mirror. This involves “filling” this part with the (hidden) furniture or sink. The offset of the contour of the door or the wooden table opposite is not impacted.-- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I had wrongly assumed that the camera was completely off the reflection on the second image (probably not even possible, given the wide focal length), but I get it now. Nice, I need to try this out :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Laos well represented with Basile. ★ 12:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The open doors make me uncomfortable, especially the one on the right that seems more prominent, but what makes me feel negative is the trash can under the sink cabinet, it seems to be in an inappropriate place and without an apparent function, it makes me uncomfortable. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't get your point about the trash can. This is where you find trash cans in hotel rooms usually - if I am looking for one in a hotel room, I look under the sink first. This is where most people need it - be it for tissues, for packaging of hygenic items, or other stuff. Why do you think it is an inappropriate place? Kritzolina (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I hadn't bothered looking at this in detail, but I agree with Wilfredo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Neither the trash can nor the open doors take away much from the image, imo.--UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support I love the infinite mirror reflection effect. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Fresh bilberries picked in Tuntorp 4.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 21:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Bilberries are the Scandinavian version of blueberries. There is an ancient tradition of picking them in our woods, and in the old days the dried berries were a staple in most Swedish kitchens. They have been made known to the rest of the world through the Vasaloppet cross-country ski race, where the participants are served traditional hot bilberry soup. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support These look tasty. --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appealing presentation and very good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support This reminds me of my vacation in Finland last summer. Nordic forests are full of them. Good quality and composition.-- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful presentation with attractive color contrasts; works as a rustic, appealing product photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Delicious looking! Even if I don't like bilberries :D --Kritzolina (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Lovely --Wilfredor (talk) 23:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 06:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support looks like caviar. Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 19:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow IMO, and distracting wire. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Grote sponszwam (Sparassis crispa). 09-11-2023. (d.j.b).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 07:19:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Sparassidaceae
- Info Sparassis crispa in natural habitat. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful contrasting autumn textures. --Cart (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support M series have pleasant color. --Mile (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support But it's a strange way to serve farfalle pasta. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Impressively detailed structures. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Delicious.--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appetizing, per Ermell and Charles. Also nice light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Superb stacking brings out the beauty of the fungus. --Tagooty (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 20:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question Would you consider flipping it 90 degrees, for greater ease in viewing the fresco? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 05:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The colours could be a bit more vivid --Llez (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Question Underexposed? ★ 20:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Low contrast and underexposed--Wilfredor (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)- Done. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Better now. ★ 14:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Neutral It feels like the roof lines of the building are not straight. But as the image was taken technically well, I will not oppose --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Pez lija pintado (Aluterus scriptus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-19, DD 47.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 19:10:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Monacanthidae_(Filefish)
- Info Scrawled filefish (Aluterus scriptus), Red Sea, Egypt. It's a medium size fish which can grow up to 110 centimetres (3.6 ft) in length and can be found in the tropical waters from the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. A. scriptus is omnivorous and have a large choice for its meals like small crustaceans, algae, gorgonians, sea anemones, tunicates, fire coral, seagrasses and hydrozoans. It's diurnal, demersal, solitary and shy with divers. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful fish, blends in pretty well with its surroundings but still set off well, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support I think the blue color of the fish is a striking element of the composition. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Кабан у лісі.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 13:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
- Info created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good-looking pig, nicely framed with the two trees. Is it carrying the stick to use for a nest or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- The stick is probably just a mishap from its recent rummaging around on the ground. These guys are notorious for disturbing soil as they look for things to eat. They are a big problem in Sweden since they get into peoples' gardens and tear them up. One family of these pigs can demolish a big lawn in just one night etc. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good framing and the twig is very telling of their behavior. --Cart (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice, clear scenery, with the blurry left tree as an interfering element creating a nice depth. I also agree with Ikan Kekek's and Cart's support reasons. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Appealing view point and consistent depth of field. Unusual twig that gives an extra touch of authenticity -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Gyrostat (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very difficult and dangerous to photograph --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Lord Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett Dunsany by Morrall-Hoole Studios.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 02:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1910-1919
- Info created by Morrall-Hoole Studios - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good retouching of a valuable picture; interesting writer. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:RhB Alvra Filisur - Alvaneu.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 19:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The Landwasser viaduct is a well-photographed subject, but this perspective from the drone isn't very common and with the fresh snow I just couldn't resist.
- Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice but there are several other FPs already. Two are yours and great. This one should be delisted please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The shooting moment is well chosen, with the red train - half hidden in the tunnel - moving in the snowy landscape. Also the deepness of the background helps the composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Excellent Kabelleger quality: Very vivid colors, great contrast and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Lights, camera... action! --Cart (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 21:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support per others, including Charles. Charles, why don't you nominate some for delisting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Because any I have nominated have attracted keep votes. And it is time consuming. I just think whoever wants to increase the number of FPs of a particular subject will have reviewed the existng FPs and should be the one to suggest a delist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The snow with the train gives the scenery something cozy --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support at this point I don't even have to look at the images by Kabelleger before voting support. I'm exciting for when (if at all) he visits India! The snowy trains of Shimla and Kashmir, steam engines of misty Darjeeling and Ooty, the vistas of Kangra, Konkan and the desert trains of the Thar, and so so much more await! --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 13:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Serranidae (Serranids)
- Info Coney (Cephalopholis fulva) camouflaged on a rock, Fernando de Noronha Marine National Park, Brazil. The park covers part of the island of Fernando de Noronha, a municipality of Pernambuco, and has an area of 10,927.64 hectares (27,002.8 acres). Created and uploaded by Jpdandretta - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- I like the composition; it's a classic example of marine/underwater camouflage. ★ 15:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The idea is good, but the quality of the picture does not seem sufficient to me. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I think people might be harder on this image than it deserves. Look what happens when you give it a bit of TLC in an editing program: Edited version. I think that could go nicely into the Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Fish gallery. What do you think? --Cart (talk) 00:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Added as alternative, thanks Cart. ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Yes, I prefer this version, with more contrast between the green algae and the background. Thank you. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality and composition are not good enough. --Tagooty (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced. This kind of fish usually hides in the reefs and hunts by night, so that I wouldn't call the scene here his habitat where it camouflages. It rather follows other predators to take advantage of prey escaping from them. And as said, quality and compo are not convincing to me. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:043 Elephant family at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not so keen on the cropped elephant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as above and the grass obscuring the others. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not enough space around: bad crop left, above, and right. Yann (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop, and vegetation in the foreground. --Tagooty (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tagooty --imehling (talk) 14:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your reviews. I understand that one of the three elephants beeing half in the frame can be disturbing for some of you at first glance. However the focus is more on the baby elephant that is at the center of the frame and that is surounded by his family, the two others elephants protecting the baby from both sides like guardians. Also the mother can be seen uncropped behind the two others. As for the vegetation, two elephants are simply walking over it and are still very visible above it. The vegetation also provides a sense of depth to the picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Bokeh
- Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- InfoThe coolness of the night caused small drops of water, called "Dew", to form on the glass of the car, which I photographed, illuminated by the sun. The dew point is the temperature at which the air becomes saturated with water vapor and water drops begin to form, i.e. condensation. Condensation occurs when the air temperature drops, reducing the amount of energy available to keep water in the form of vapor. A natural phenomenon from which a beautiful image to see is born. Inside each drop you can see concentric circles forming the drop itself.
A photo of the same type has already been recognized as featured, but I propose this one that I took later because it seems even more visually beautiful to me.
- Oppose I opposed the last one and I cannot think why we would want to promote another. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is for sure and I might even support this one if the other is removed... 18:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
- ːIn the meantime, let's see if someone else votes for this image, if this one passes, then we will intervene on the other one.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 06:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Yes, this is beautiful. I think the two pictures are different enough in appearance and composition to both be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I think so too, but I wrote about the presence of the other photo out of honesty. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Hôtel Le Concorde Québec.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:51:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition! ★ 13:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Nice slice of life. The hotel looks like it's about to take off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tmv (talk) 00:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment Over-saturation. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Voted --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)OpposeAs said, oversaturated, buildings leaning clockwise. --Mile (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
OpposePretty but it lacks sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Poco a poco: Please take another look --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I thought about doing that too but the image would look very elongated like those phone images. Also leaving the tree in the foreground shows the distance and that there are more trees around. It is difficult to please everyone, for some it is clear and for others it is too clear. Generally I do not apply any filters to my photos, only when they request it, as was your case. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Done @Poco a poco: Please take another look --Wilfredor (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support If you insist its not oversaturated, I overlook it and this one is nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif not special enough IMO. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty but not special. --Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support beautiful --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 11:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Parc publique du Bois-de-Coulonge, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 05:50:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 05:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose until the hallooing is taken care of. Nice shot otherwise - Benh (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Long exposure would be even better, clouds, water... --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The subject is so striking that I can't resist. I wish the light had been better. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Cool topiary! I don't love the right crop, but I find this picture irresistible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Жук стрибун.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 13:25:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cicindelidae (Tiger Beetles) (section does not exist yet)
- Info created by Сергій Мірошник - uploaded by Сергій Мірошник - nominated by Anntinomy -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Anntinomy (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but depth of field is too narrow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree. I'd like to see more of the insect sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Really a pity about this picture that the depth of field is insufficient, because composition, subject, and moment are great. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Looking at their other images submitted to QI, there may be some creative post-processing here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Nobody said that photographing insects was easy, but unfortunately there is a lack of depth of field here, additionally some kind of filter makes the hairs of the insect represented without real textures. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Info This is a beetle (order Coleoptera), not a bee, wasp, or ant (order Hymenoptera). The intended gallery is wrong. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The dof is really narrow and it ends rather abruptly, that makes it look weird. Also I'm not a fan of this overly dark/black editing that seems to be so popular in East European countries. --Cart (talk) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Cavolinia tridentata 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2023 at 10:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Cavoliniidae
- Info This small shell (1.3 cm) has an unusual shape for a gastropod. It belongs to a small group of gastropods that do not crawl on the substrate, but are found floating freely in warmer seas around the world. The animal's body is also unusual, as it looks more like a butterfly than a snail. Hence the name “Sea butterflies” for this group of gastropods; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Unusual shape of shell. Mix of ray, snail and turtle? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Right, the shapes are noticeably different depending on the viewing direction. Valuable, good picture; thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cart (talk) 10:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but it's not sharp enough for me at full reso. -- Ivar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Your professional level camera will produce much sharper pictures than an enthusiast's crop frame camera (one that I used to use). Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Luzern asv2022-10 Gotthardgebäude img03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 23:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Switzerland
- Info Representative conference hall of the former Gotthard Railway headquarters building in Lucerne, which is now used by a branch of the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. All by me, --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 23:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very nice interior scene with warm wood tones. The perspective creates a good three-dimensional impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I dunno... The light is nice, but I feel like the noise reduction is a bit heavy...--Peulle (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Look like stacked image, not handsfree. I dislike composition, tight crop bellow and choped desk on left. You could move camera a bit down, and a bit to the right side. Or 12, 13 mm. Colors-reflexions are not so attractive. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me. I'd love for more of the picture frame to be even sharper, but it's a nice composition to me, a beautiful room with beautiful furniture, and I really don't see what more is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top in my view. The seat legs lack space in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Basile, crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Wooden pig merry-go-round in Brastad 3.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 13:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Toys
- Info I have been photographing playgrounds for a while, and this crazy-looking pig has haunted me ever since. I hope the kids aren't too traumatized by it. This farm-themed playground was built in 2018, based on ideas and designs made by the fifth-graders of the local Stångenäs school; many of them live on farms in the area. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Cart (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support horror-film material. Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ..."there is a distinct lack of deranged wooden pigs on FPC..." and this nomination is a good way to mitigate the fact --Kritzolina (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support OK perhaps not quite as horrible as this pig made of tires, but still quite good. --A.Savin 23:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Something out of the ordinary, definitely an eye-catcher of a different kind. Probably you'll get a little scared at first in the twilight :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is very cluttered. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. At least some background separation would have been nice (not that it would have changed my vote tbh) - Benh (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The diagonal piece of wood is questionable to include, but it rhymes with the slide. But the truly weird pig is the star, and otherwise, per other supporters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:41, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Cluttered composition --Tagooty (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, the background is rather busy, but that's the way playgrounds work. I also like that it provides context for the pig. The place is tidy, still in daily use and it's clear that the pig is not a prop at some abandoned amusement park or something like that. --Cart (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Tagooty. -- Karelj (talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A8124.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 10:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Diomedeidae (Albatross)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The bird is great, but the waves didn't cooperate. The unfocused swell down right ruins the composition for me. Too bad. --Cart (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support It's a nice shot in itself but the tip of the wing lying between swells makes it even more incredible in my view, and shows the bird was flying very low - Benh (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Very good, highly professional capture. The natural blur gives the scene a lot of depth. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The most common background for birds in flight photography is a boring blue sky background. In my opinion the waves in this photo give a very welcome sense of depth to the subject as well as a context to the image. Also, shooting birds in flight with a background behind them is a lot more difficult than simple plain blue sky as it is generally more difficult to keep the subject in focus in this scenario. Also the camera seems very close to water level, which makes this shot even harder to do. In summary, I think it is a very good shot of a bird in flight. --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support The level of blur of the wave is a bit distracting, however I agree with Benh and Giles Laurent -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support compo as first --Mile (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. --Gyrostat (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)[edit]
Thu 14 Dec → Tue 19 Dec Fri 15 Dec → Wed 20 Dec Sat 16 Dec → Thu 21 Dec Sun 17 Dec → Fri 22 Dec Mon 18 Dec → Sat 23 Dec Tue 19 Dec → Sun 24 Dec
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)[edit]
Sat 09 Dec → Tue 19 Dec Sun 10 Dec → Wed 20 Dec Mon 11 Dec → Thu 21 Dec Tue 12 Dec → Fri 22 Dec Wed 13 Dec → Sat 23 Dec Thu 14 Dec → Sun 24 Dec Fri 15 Dec → Mon 25 Dec Sat 16 Dec → Tue 26 Dec Sun 17 Dec → Wed 27 Dec Mon 18 Dec → Thu 28 Dec Tue 19 Dec → Fri 29 Dec