निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2023 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:023 African pygmy kingfisher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:023 African pygmy kingfisher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Info View of olive groves and fields in the foothills and valleys of Umbria, SE of Spello. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Didn't expect to be taken in by this, but the landscape is very pleasant, and the composition with layering diagonals in the cool light works perfectly. --Cart(talk) 10:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Not under a free license, and too small by today standards. Yann (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 19:14:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Common kingfisher in Japan, December 2023 - 4915.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Common kingfisher in Japan, December 2023 - 4915.jpg
Support Given the settings showing up in exif data (1/10 sec, f/4, 3,200 ISO, 600 mm), this shot might have been difficult to take, in a very dark place, and certainly with a good tripod -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A bit strong vignetting but still very good picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info A young male African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) striding across the forest road in early morning, trunk raised to smell, Kafue National Park, Zambia. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Elephants are so easy to photograph (and many FPs); the composition needs to be more interesting with the animal being on a road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Sharp, good composition. Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Per Yann. ★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Charles, I miss the extraordinary part of this image (lighting, detail, activity,...). I don't think either that the human-made road helps here. Poco a poco (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I understand that it must be a great experience to see a wild elephant this close, but there is nothing of that little extra in the composition, light or the things that would make this stand out. And the road doesn't help here. --Cart(talk) 20:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 02:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Table-banquette by Annie Tribel 1968 - Design Museum Brussels Belgium.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Table-banquette by Annie Tribel 1968 - Design Museum Brussels Belgium.jpg
Weak support A nice photo though clipped whites is a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 05:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support★ 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Looks timelessly futuristic and could have come from the set design for the Hilton of Space Station 5 in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Great symmetrical capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2023 at 03:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River.jpg
Info Lonely fisherman crossing the Doce River, in Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Fishing activity on the Doce River has been significantly affected after the 2015 environment disaster, when the failure of a dam released 43.7 million cubic metres of mine tailings into the river, causing a toxic mudflow to pollute its waters; the mudflow consequently reached the Atlantic Ocean 17 days later. This image illustrates all the drama that has occurred since then. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support You can say "too minimalist composition" but there's a whole aforementioned dramatic context behind the image. -- ★ 03:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment No reason for black and white, imho. --Laitche (talk) 05:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info@Laitche: Right, I just uploaded the original version; let's see what others think about this (P.S.: I still prefer the B&W style, in my opinion). ★ 09:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info This species is endemic to the Eastern Andes of Colombia and is IUCN red list Vulnerable. It was found by sound triangulation on a rainy afternoon. No FPs of this family of frogs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Focus stacking at this distance is not easy, and here the result is very clean. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Exceptional image of a rare subject. --Tagooty (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support★ 15:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment A great, sharp photo of the Pristimantis elegans, certainly not taken under easy conditions. There are some bright dots/traces on dark ground in the right and upper right part of the image. If you like, I can remove them and provide you the edit via transfer link. But if the dots are supposed to be like that, no offense, I just want to help :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
White spots pretty much as RAW, but brightened during stacking, so I've toned them back thanks. Streaks are rain. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Thanks very much for your editing, Charles. But I only meant the small white dots on the dark background on the right and not the reflections on the foliage. I have now annotated it above. I'm sorry if I didn't express myself correctly and we misunderstood each other as a result. I took the liberty of retouching yesterday's version (revision from 22:13, Dec 18, 2023). Please feel free to use it if you like: Link to download. I apologize for the misunderstanding. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Another beautiful semi-contre-jour take with great technical and compositional quality. Thanks for the nomination! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The overexposure was clear in this photo, an attempt was made to reduce it by lowering the lighting until the white was transformed into gray. And no wow for the composition --Wilfredor (talk) 06:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Bright part of the image wasn't handled very well and the processing treatment has left strange artifacts around the window frame. Maybe a blue sky or an interesting cloud would be better than a rainy grey day? Out of interest, what was the symbolism supposed to be here? BigDom (talk) 15:02, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Perhaps not the best angle for this. When faced with a very bright opening, it's often better to go for the things that the light illuminates and let the bright window be implied. So many cool angles and lines in the scene that could be used for that. Making the light grey doesn't help either. --Cart(talk) 22:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 15:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Riomaggiore SE Wide Cinque Terre Italy Sep23 A7C 07305.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riomaggiore SE Wide Cinque Terre Italy Sep23 A7C 07305.jpg
Info The colourful village of Riomaggiore on a cloudy afternoon. One of the five villages of Cinque Terre, Italy which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support★ 18:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The weather did not help in this photo, it also looks unclear, possibly due to lens distortion or lack of luminosity. Also the composition seems to try to place the sea and the houses, but neither of them seems like a main subject, the houses look cut off and the sea too. The contrast and low exposure make this colorful scene look like a Gothic city. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately I agree with Wilfredo regarding the composition and the fact that the weather was not on your side this time, bad luck. BigDom (talk) 15:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. To me the beauty is the bright colourful buildings despite the overcast sky. --Tagooty (talk) 03:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2023 at 08:16:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre, Málaga, España, 2023-05-20, DD 08-10 HDR.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre, Málaga, España, 2023-05-20, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg
Info Ceiling of the Oratory of Saint Mary Queen and Mother, Málaga, Spain. The church was constructed in 2008 and is host of the Confraternity of the Sorrows. The paintings in the ceiling, done with acrylic paint, are work of Raúl Berzosa Fernández and were executed in different phases between 2008 and 2014. The 140 square metres (1,500 sq ft) surface is dedicated to the Coronation of the Virgin. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support A very impressive, beautiful ceiling fresco, excellently captured; a fine example of comparatively new paintings of this type in a modern church building. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Unusual to see a modern interpretation. The 21st Century people are so well executed. (the photo's OK too!) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The mural on the downside of the floor in the top of the image makes it unique --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support for the composition and technical quality but clarity needed on the copyright status. {{FoP-Spain}} (which is missing by the way) only mentions outdoor artworks such as those in parks, streets and other thoroughfares. What is the situation for indoor artworks or are these ones known to be freely licensed? BigDom (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Modern frescos in this "old" style are an acquired taste. To me they look rather tacky, but it's a happy tacky that lots of devout people evidently like, and this is a really good photo of a great example of it. --Cart(talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 22:30:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Infinity mirror, hand-washing sink and wardrobes in the spa of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Infinity mirror, hand-washing sink and wardrobes in the spa of Amantaka luxury Resort & Hotel in Luang Prabang Laos.jpg
Support Nicely done. --Yann (talk) 23:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question How did you not show up in the reflection in the mirror? dllu(t,c) 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Answer The explanation is given in the {{Retouched}} template, in the file page : The camera and its tripod reflected in the mirrors have been deleted in post-process. To achieve this purpose, two pictures have been taken from different positions, targeting the same direction. Then, both images have been superimposed and the content replaced in each. -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very good technical and compositional realization of the Droste effect. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Fascinating, I wouldn't have imagined you could get this effect without using bellows or a tilt-shift lens! Do you mind letting me know if I got your method right: 1) you took two images, both centred on the mirror, one with the camera in the middle of the room, one with the camera slightly shifted (to the left, judging by the slight offset in the reflection?); 2) you used the first image for the room and the second one for the reflection? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks! Yes, exactly, you got everything right, except for the slight offset in the reflection, which is probably caused by imperfect alignment of the mirrors opposite each other, rather than by camera shift. The second image is used just to compensate for the small area where the camera appears through the mirror. This involves “filling” this part with the (hidden) furniture or sink. The offset of the contour of the door or the wooden table opposite is not impacted.-- Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, I had wrongly assumed that the camera was completely off the reflection on the second image (probably not even possible, given the wide focal length), but I get it now. Nice, I need to try this out :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Laos well represented with Basile. ★ 12:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The open doors make me uncomfortable, especially the one on the right that seems more prominent, but what makes me feel negative is the trash can under the sink cabinet, it seems to be in an inappropriate place and without an apparent function, it makes me uncomfortable. --Wilfredor (talk) 06:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, but I don't get your point about the trash can. This is where you find trash cans in hotel rooms usually - if I am looking for one in a hotel room, I look under the sink first. This is where most people need it - be it for tissues, for packaging of hygenic items, or other stuff. Why do you think it is an inappropriate place? Kritzolina (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I hadn't bothered looking at this in detail, but I agree with Wilfredo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. -- Karelj (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Neither the trash can nor the open doors take away much from the image, imo.--UnpetitproleX(Talk) 10:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I love the infinite mirror reflection effect. --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 21:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Fresh bilberries picked in Tuntorp 4.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fresh bilberries picked in Tuntorp 4.jpg
Info Bilberries are the Scandinavian version of blueberries. There is an ancient tradition of picking them in our woods, and in the old days the dried berries were a staple in most Swedish kitchens. They have been made known to the rest of the world through the Vasaloppet cross-country ski race, where the participants are served traditional hot bilberry soup. All by me, -- Cart(talk) 21:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support These look tasty. --Yann (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, they were! :-) After they were cleaned and ready to be served, they looked like this (sound on). Half went with ice cream and the rest into a pie. --Cart(talk) 23:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Appealing presentation and very good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This reminds me of my vacation in Finland last summer. Nordic forests are full of them. Good quality and composition.-- Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Beautiful presentation with attractive color contrasts; works as a rustic, appealing product photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2023 at 19:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Peter church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 20:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Anastasia of Palatine basilica in Rome (3).jpg
Question Would you consider flipping it 90 degrees, for greater ease in viewing the fresco? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Neutral It feels like the roof lines of the building are not straight. But as the image was taken technically well, I will not oppose --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
InfoScrawled filefish (Aluterus scriptus), Red Sea, Egypt. It's a medium size fish which can grow up to 110 centimetres (3.6 ft) in length and can be found in the tropical waters from the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. A. scriptus is omnivorous and have a large choice for its meals like small crustaceans, algae, gorgonians, sea anemones, tunicates, fire coral, seagrasses and hydrozoans. It's diurnal, demersal, solitary and shy with divers. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Beautiful fish, blends in pretty well with its surroundings but still set off well, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support I think the blue color of the fish is a striking element of the composition. Thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good-looking pig, nicely framed with the two trees. Is it carrying the stick to use for a nest or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The stick is probably just a mishap from its recent rummaging around on the ground. These guys are notorious for disturbing soil as they look for things to eat. They are a big problem in Sweden since they get into peoples' gardens and tear them up. One family of these pigs can demolish a big lawn in just one nightetc. --Cart(talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good framing and the twig is very telling of their behavior. --Cart(talk) 00:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Nice, clear scenery, with the blurry left tree as an interfering element creating a nice depth. I also agree with Ikan Kekek's and Cart's support reasons. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Appealing view point and consistent depth of field. Unusual twig that gives an extra touch of authenticity -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very difficult and dangerous to photograph --Wilfredor (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Small wild boars such as this one are not really dangerous. Old males or females with piglets could be. Yann (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2023 at 02:14:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Lord Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett Dunsany by Morrall-Hoole Studios.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lord Edward John Moreton Drax Plunkett Dunsany by Morrall-Hoole Studios.jpg
Info created by Morrall-Hoole Studios - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment The Landwasser viaduct is a well-photographed subject, but this perspective from the drone isn't very common and with the fresh snow I just couldn't resist.
Comment Very nice but there are several other FPs already. Two are yours and great. This one should be delisted please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The shooting moment is well chosen, with the red train - half hidden in the tunnel - moving in the snowy landscape. Also the deepness of the background helps the composition. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Excellent Kabelleger quality: Very vivid colors, great contrast and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per others, including Charles. Charles, why don't you nominate some for delisting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Because any I have nominated have attracted keep votes. And it is time consuming. I just think whoever wants to increase the number of FPs of a particular subject will have reviewed the existng FPs and should be the one to suggest a delist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support at this point I don't even have to look at the images by Kabelleger before voting support. I'm exciting for when (if at all) he visits India! The snowy trains of Shimla and Kashmir, steam engines of misty Darjeeling and Ooty, the vistas of Kangra, Konkan and the desert trains of the Thar, and so so much more await! --UnpetitproleX(Talk) 11:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 13:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 1.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 1.jpg
Support -- ★ 13:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ArionStar: I'm surprised about this nom. If the highlight in your eyes here is the grouper, then it is too small, detail is rather low (if that's what you are looking for, a good candidate of the same genus could be this one :) ), if the highlight in your eyes is the whole thing (grouper + environment), then it's also tricky because the red sponges are not really sharp and the whole composition is not appealing. Poco a poco (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I like the composition; it's a classic example of marine/underwater camouflage. ★ 15:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info Added as alternative, thanks Cart. ★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support★ 10:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Yes, I prefer this version, with more contrast between the green algae and the background. Thank you. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'm not convinced. This kind of fish usually hides in the reefs and hunts by night, so that I wouldn't call the scene here his habitat where it camouflages. It rather follows other predators to take advantage of prey escaping from them. And as said, quality and compo are not convincing to me. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:043 Elephant family at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:043 Elephant family at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Comment Thank you for your reviews. I understand that one of the three elephants beeing half in the frame can be disturbing for some of you at first glance. However the focus is more on the baby elephant that is at the center of the frame and that is surounded by his family, the two others elephants protecting the baby from both sides like guardians. Also the mother can be seen uncropped behind the two others. As for the vegetation, two elephants are simply walking over it and are still very visible above it. The vegetation also provides a sense of depth to the picture. --Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2023 at 09:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wls 2023 Gocce di rugiada formatasi su vetro nella notte, per condensazione, illuminate dal sole.jpg
InfoThe coolness of the night caused small drops of water, called "Dew", to form on the glass of the car, which I photographed, illuminated by the sun. The dew point is the temperature at which the air becomes saturated with water vapor and water drops begin to form, i.e. condensation. Condensation occurs when the air temperature drops, reducing the amount of energy available to keep water in the form of vapor. A natural phenomenon from which a beautiful image to see is born. Inside each drop you can see concentric circles forming the drop itself.
A photo of the same type has already been recognized as featured, but I propose this one that I took later because it seems even more visually beautiful to me.
Oppose I opposed the last one and I cannot think why we would want to promote another. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:27, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Maybe because this one is even more beautiful? And then there's also a new category, which I discovered thanks to Cart! (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:55, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is for sure and I might even support this one if the other is removed... 18:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)
Support. Yes, this is beautiful. I think the two pictures are different enough in appearance and composition to both be featured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Over-saturation. --Laitche (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC) Voted --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose As said, oversaturated, buildings leaning clockwise. --Mile (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Its not oversatured, it was natural colors. Look for images on the internet of what autumn is like in Canada, the colors here are very very vibrant --Wilfredor (talk) 11:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What about the buildings, its not PD but rotation is due. Mile (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
An improvement, but you went a bit too far. I move now to Neutral. Personally I've cropped the bunch of tree on the right, but no big deal Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I thought about doing that too but the image would look very elongated like those phone images. Also leaving the tree in the foreground shows the distance and that there are more trees around. It is difficult to please everyone, for some it is clear and for others it is too clear. Generally I do not apply any filters to my photos, only when they request it, as was your case. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak support If you insist its not oversaturated, I overlook it and this one is nice photo. --Laitche (talk) 13:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Motif not special enough IMO. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Pretty but not special. --Tagooty (talk) 08:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The subject is so striking that I can't resist. I wish the light had been better. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Cool topiary! I don't love the right crop, but I find this picture irresistible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nice idea, but depth of field is too narrow. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose I agree. I'd like to see more of the insect sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Really a pity about this picture that the depth of field is insufficient, because composition, subject, and moment are great. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Looking at their other images submitted to QI, there may be some creative post-processing here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Nobody said that photographing insects was easy, but unfortunately there is a lack of depth of field here, additionally some kind of filter makes the hairs of the insect represented without real textures. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info This is a beetle (order Coleoptera), not a bee, wasp, or ant (order Hymenoptera). The intended gallery is wrong. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for spotting this. Gallery fixed. --Cart(talk) 21:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose The dof is really narrow and it ends rather abruptly, that makes it look weird. Also I'm not a fan of this overly dark/black editing that seems to be so popular in East European countries. --Cart(talk) 20:58, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Info This small shell (1.3 cm) has an unusual shape for a gastropod. It belongs to a small group of gastropods that do not crawl on the substrate, but are found floating freely in warmer seas around the world. The animal's body is also unusual, as it looks more like a butterfly than a snail. Hence the name “Sea butterflies” for this group of gastropods; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Unusual shape of shell. Mix of ray, snail and turtle? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Right, the shapes are noticeably different depending on the viewing direction. Valuable, good picture; thanks for the nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose sorry, but it's not sharp enough for me at full reso. -- Ivar (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Please remember, the shell has only 1.3 cm. --Llez (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment 13 mm is not extreme for macro lens, imo it should be sharper. Compare with this 19 mm long sand wasp. -- Ivar (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Your professional level camera will produce much sharper pictures than an enthusiast's crop frame camera (one that I used to use). Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very nice interior scene with warm wood tones. The perspective creates a good three-dimensional impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment I dunno... The light is nice, but I feel like the noise reduction is a bit heavy...--Peulle (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I thought this too but maybe it's that the wood is very well crafted? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Look like stacked image, not handsfree. I dislike composition, tight crop bellow and choped desk on left. You could move camera a bit down, and a bit to the right side. Or 12, 13 mm. Colors-reflexions are not so attractive. --Mile (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Looks good to me. I'd love for more of the picture frame to be even sharper, but it's a nice composition to me, a beautiful room with beautiful furniture, and I really don't see what more is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top in my view. The seat legs lack space in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose as per Basile, crop too tight at the bottom, and too generous at the top. Christian Ferrer(talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support★ 20:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2023 at 13:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden pig merry-go-round in Brastad 3.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden pig merry-go-round in Brastad 3.jpg
Info I have been photographing playgrounds for a while, and this crazy-looking pig has haunted me ever since. I hope the kids aren't too traumatized by it. This farm-themed playground was built in 2018, based on ideas and designs made by the fifth-graders of the local Stångenäs school; many of them live on farms in the area. All by me, -- Cart(talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support horror-film material. Tomer T (talk) 14:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support ..."there is a distinct lack of deranged wooden pigs on FPC..." and this nomination is a good way to mitigate the fact --Kritzolina (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Something out of the ordinary, definitely an eye-catcher of a different kind. Probably you'll get a little scared at first in the twilight :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose per above. At least some background separation would have been nice (not that it would have changed my vote tbh) - Benh (talk) 19:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The diagonal piece of wood is questionable to include, but it rhymes with the slide. But the truly weird pig is the star, and otherwise, per other supporters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Cluttered composition --Tagooty (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Yes, the background is rather busy, but that's the way playgrounds work. I also like that it provides context for the pig. The place is tidy, still in daily use and it's clear that the pig is not a prop at some abandoned amusement park or something like that. --Cart(talk) 12:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Weak oppose The bird is great, but the waves didn't cooperate. The unfocused swell down right ruins the composition for me. Too bad. --Cart(talk) 10:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support It's a nice shot in itself but the tip of the wing lying between swells makes it even more incredible in my view, and shows the bird was flying very low - Benh (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Very good, highly professional capture. The natural blur gives the scene a lot of depth. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The most common background for birds in flight photography is a boring blue sky background. In my opinion the waves in this photo give a very welcome sense of depth to the subject as well as a context to the image. Also, shooting birds in flight with a background behind them is a lot more difficult than simple plain blue sky as it is generally more difficult to keep the subject in focus in this scenario. Also the camera seems very close to water level, which makes this shot even harder to do. In summary, I think it is a very good shot of a bird in flight. --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support The level of blur of the wave is a bit distracting, however I agree with Benh and Giles Laurent -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
सीधे वर्तमान उम्मीदवार पर पहुँचें।
_underside_Nyamebe_Bepo.jpg)
.jpg)
._09-11-2023._(d.j.b).jpg)
.jpg)
,_mar_Rojo,_Egipto,_2023-04-19,_DD_47.jpg)
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
.jpg)
_underside_Nyamebe_Bepo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._09-11-2023._(d.j.b).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_mar_Rojo,_Egipto,_2023-04-19,_DD_47.jpg){kind=link}
_underside_Nyamebe_Bepo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_underside_Nyamebe_Bepo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._09-11-2023._(d.j.b).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._09-11-2023._(d.j.b).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_mar_Rojo,_Egipto,_2023-04-19,_DD_47.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_mar_Rojo,_Egipto,_2023-04-19,_DD_47.jpg){kind=link}
,_mar_Rojo,_Egipto,_2023-04-17,_DD_167.jpg){kind=link}
